When construct_raid_bdev RPC is callled, even if all adding base bdevs
to it fail, a raid bdev with no base bdev should exist and be in
the configuring state.
Extract raid_bdev_create() from raid_bdev_add_base_bdev() and put it
before starting iteration of raid_bdev_add_base_bdev().
This change cam be applied to .INI config file too.
Change-Id: Ia71aca0bbdb33049fe5bd9b8fd8163c99c032401
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424148
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Cleverly, UT for raid bdev sets number of base bdevs by using
the random number generator.
When the random number generator outputs 1, test code especially
for single base bdev case failed.
When removing raid_bdev_send_passthru from library, the corresponding
test code was not removed.
This patch removes the test code.
Change-Id: I23be88358fe364bc757979a26398b80339e19910
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424159
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
There is a race condition with the following sequence:
spdk_bdev_open()
spdk_bdev_unregister() <-- starts deferred message
spdk_bdev_close()
deferred message runs, crashes
Change-Id: I81fbced0849949cfb2dae5a7cc6f60c9685a8885
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424739
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Latest scan-build finds a legitimate issue here - although
it's not clear why it was only found when testing against
a seemingly unrelated patch...
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ic981f6f403c638b0b2d454c0be9f7fbe145171d9
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424887
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
spdk_bdev_close() must be called on the same thread as
spdk_bdev_open(). Further, the remove callback on the
descriptor will also be run on the same thread as
spdk_bdev_open().
Change-Id: I949d6dd67de1e63d39f06944d473e4aa7134111b
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424738
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: GangCao <gang.cao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
This was added a long time back for tracking an rte_mbuf
whose buffer was a different rte_mbuf - all related to
a userspace TCP stack that is no longer in development.
The concept isn't useful now, so remove it to reduce
the complexity of the tracing code.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I310e492eba7f55df242bb29d82fb19f6daee1f51
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424565
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
This issue is related to Clang assuming that global variables can be
modified from their original value.
Change-Id: I576a4af7e379a951a9f971850391c7e17145df87
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424717
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
This is a string name used for debugging only.
Change-Id: I9827f0e6c83be7bc13951c7b5f0951ce6c2a1ece
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424127
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Set the bdev->optimal_io_boundary to the strip size, and
set split_on_optimal_io_boundary = true. This will ensure
that all I/O submitted to the raid module do not cross
a strip boundary, meaning it does not need to be split
across multiple member disks.
This is a step towards removing the iovcnt == 1
limitation. Further improvements and simplifications
will be made in future patches before removing this
restriction.
Unit tests need to be adjusted here to not span
boundaries either.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I08943805def673288f552a1b7662a4fbe16f25eb
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423323
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Splitting a 1TB unmap into individual 64KB unmap commands
(for a RAID volume with 64KB strip size) would be awful -
the RAID module can be much smarter about this.
So back out the changes for splitting I/O without payload.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I24fe6d911f4e3c9db4b2cb5d66c7236a5596e0d9
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424103
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Fixes a use after free error in bdev/bdev_ut
Fixes an uninitialized argument value error in mt/bdev/bdev_ut
Adds extra checks in the spdk_bdev_part_construct code
Fixes a dereference of null pointer error in bdev/vbdev_lvol_ut
Change-Id: I1eaa6ebfec0a36a0d910504c70b16ccc651de22a
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423923
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
This removes assumptions about hte lifecycle of these variables relative
to the parent bdev and allows us to avoid ambiguity about who
is responsible for freeing these buffers.
Change-Id: Ia996653562d532fa1501faf21d3fdff85033ab33
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424105
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
When a raid bdev is constructed by JSON-RPC construct_raid_bdev,
information about config and slot can be passed to
raid_bdev_add_base_device() and raid_bdev_can_claim() doesn't have
to be called.
Hence extract raid_bdev_can_claim_bdev() from raid_bdev_add_base_device()
and put it to raid_bdev_examine().
Change-Id: I92e02bf3661cb97b691246f32198ba946810d96c
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423618
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
raid_base_bdev_config is suffciently descriptive as name and so
"name" can be used as the name of the base bdev.
Other structs have used "name" as the name of bdev.
Change-Id: I090ef541a84fd14d9ec3bfebbdc96ae649709551
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423614
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
According to the purpose of the lists, state_link and global_link
will be enough to understand the purpose well.
Besides, in raid_bdev_remove_base_bdev(), if any entry is not removed
during iteration, TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE() is not necessary. Hence
change TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE to TAILQ_FOREACH for this case.
Change-Id: I3022c58faf96721df9241e07dbb5a06d7de89e70
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423056
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
struct raid_bdev has a pointer raid_bdev_config to its configuration,
but raid_bdev is duplicated between raid_bdev and raid_bdev_config
and just config may be enough as a name.
Change-Id: I77f6a69b913cd540c22f05803c486a4caf103f24
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/422923
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
base_bdevs_io_channel is good but base_channel may be enough and
fit other bdev modules.
Change-Id: I67a1d224f1ef4ca1fc048b4325333f2552a37150
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/422921
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
raid_base_bdev_info is sufficiently descriptive as name and so
names of member variables in raid_base_bdev_info can be simplified.
Change-Id: I759a758ec0f3ac21de767ad379a902f1b04cc66d
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/422919
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
A number of modules (RAID, logical volumes) have logical
"stripes" that require splitting an I/O into several
child I/O. For example, on a RAID-0 with 128KB strip size,
an I/O that spans a 128KB boundary will require sending
one I/O for the portion that comes before the boundary to
one member disk, and another I/O for the portion that comes
after the boundary to another member disk. Logical volumes
are similar - data is allocated in clusters, so an I/O that
spans a cluster boundary may need to be split since the
clusters may not be contiguous on disk.
Putting the splitting logic in the common bdev layer ensures
bdev module authors don't have to always do this themselves.
This is especially helpful for cases like splitting an I/O
described by many iovs - we can simplify this a lot by
handling it in the common bdev layer.
Note that currently we will only submit one child I/O
at a time. This could be improved later to submit multiple
child I/O in parallel, but the complexity in the iov splitting
code also increases a lot.
Note: Some Intel NVMe SSDs have a similar characteristic.
We will not use this bdev stripe feature for NVMe though -
we want to primarily use the splitting functionality inside
of the NVMe driver itself to ensure it remains fully
functional. Many SPDK users use the NVMe driver without
the bdev layer.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ife804ecc56f6b2b55345a0d0ae9fda9e68632b3b
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423024
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
A new unit test in an upcoming patch will initialize the bdev
layer separately, so modify the existing tests now so that
they properly cleanup the bdev layer after the unit test
that initialized it is complete.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ie00837a90391ca4d0dd578e978fb26483fe5c0cf
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423023
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
So we don't need to allocate memory (maybe failed) just for free other
memory.
Change-Id: I2c83f6acc2aa6ed79455bff90f952a2e70b44d59
Signed-off-by: wuzhouhui <wuzhouhui@kingsoft.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/422203
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
The intents of these arrays was to keep track in the
bdev layer of all base<->virtual bdev relationships -
i.e. which member disk bdevs make up a RAID bdev,
which logical volume bdevs are associated with a
bdev that contains an lvolstore, etc.
Currently none of this is used however. And trying
to keep track in the bdev layer instead of asking
the bdev modules for the relationships has a number
of complications. Early one, we tried to do this
with TAILQs - but that doesn't work since this can't
be done with a single TAILQ_ENTRY in the bdev
structures. So we moved to arrays - that works a bit
better, but then the pointer arrays have to be
realloc'd which isn't ideal.
The biggest problem though with these arrays is that
they held bdev pointers - not bdev descriptor pointers.
It's not really valid to access bdevs without a
descriptor - the descriptors are what make sure active
references are accounted for when a bdev is hotplugged.
Of course the bdev layer knows when a bdev is getting
removed and could go and do the updates to these
arrays separately - but that just seems very convoluted.
So for now just remove these arrays completely. If
there is a future need for the bdev layer to
understand relationships between bdevs, we can add
module APIs so that the generic layer can ask
the modules about the relationships.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I99ef1068240bff1262f64f234260cf2fb44df51d
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/420932
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: GangCao <gang.cao@intel.com>
When an SPDK application shuts down, the bdev layer will
automatically unregister all of the bdevs to ensure they
are properly quiesced and cleaned up.
Some modules may want to perform different operations when
a bdev is destructed during normal runtime vs. shutdown.
For example, for lvol, when the last lvol is cleaned up,
it should unload the lvolstore, release and close the bdev
that contains the lvolstore. You never want to do this
during normal runtime though - it is perfectly valid to
have an lvolstore that contains no lvols. RAID and future
bdev modules such as multipath have similar use cases.
So add a new bdev module callback named "fini_start".
If a module specifies a function pointer for this callback,
the bdev layer will call it before it starts the bdev
unregistrations.
This enables some future patches to the bdev layer such
that it will always unregister block devices that are not
claimed (i.e. logical volumes) before block devices that
are claimed (i.e. the bdev containing an lvolstore).
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I6e87f5c2b27f16731ea5def858f26e882a29495a
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/421175
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
During IO submission, raid_bdev can be get by bdev_io->bdev->ctxt.
Hence holding raid_bdev in raid_bdev_io_channel is duplicated.
Change-Id: I722432718aca8c5846541816b6ecca56821d77f6
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/421182
Reviewed-by: Dariusz Stojaczyk <dariuszx.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: GangCao <gang.cao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Locating spdk_bdev structure to the beginning of raid_bdev structure
will simplify the hierarchy and match other bdev modules.
Change-Id: I1bfbf773bc96a4f144e6bff772ade05bb42762e9
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/420818
Reviewed-by: Dariusz Stojaczyk <dariuszx.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Use strdup for all strings allocated by JSON decoder and free them on
all paths.
Change-Id: Ia30d32c2fd6bd79f62588ca19bd3bb093d38a502
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/420325
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
For front-ends like iSCSI (and NVMe-oF in the future)
which want the backend to specify the data buffer, the
RAID module doesn't copy the pointer to the allocated
buffer from the child IO back to the parent IO. It
really can't copy the pointer - the child IO owns it
and will free it.
So the RAID module needs to allocate the buffer first
and then pass it down.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I3b1eceac9b1cdd26130e59e1d400c9869a19f881
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/420677
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Since destroy_lvol_bdev was implemented, it is now more convinient
to call destroy/unload for lvol store explicitly.
Rather than using lvs struct to pass a request checked on each
lvol close/destroy.
Change-Id: I56ee626e96f8752909d1584a20fe3345c5607fdc
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/420285
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ziye Yang <optimistyzy@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
This patch fixes lvol delete behaviour.
First, we look if there are any dependencies that disallow lvol deletion.
If there are any (i.e. dependent clones) we fail.
Otherwise we delete lvol and unregister associated bdev.
destroy_bdev no longer deletes lvol.
Fixes#345
Signed-off-by: Piotr Pelplinski <piotr.pelplinski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
Change-Id: I99e6abded2ed3ae2742103f81fc7eb937ad1cab4
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/407402
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Previously on all ut_lvol_* tests, creation of lvs was mocked.
There is no reason to keep it that way instead of creating
actual lvs using same code that is unit tested.
Change-Id: Id0a7816da0c195d596a6da516471b3f46bb4e475
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/419562
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maciej Szwed <maciej.szwed@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
This variable was unnecessary since one within lvs->bs_dev
can be used to verify functionality and within stubs.
Change-Id: I43e12236e08f70381e0da5730b760db4ec3c577b
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/419561
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maciej Szwed <maciej.szwed@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell5141@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Those did not affect the tests, thus can be removed.
Change-Id: Ic1a23d4a40a0b5af1a2aff770e6eb4f0614c8f04
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/419560
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maciej Szwed <maciej.szwed@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Dariusz Stojaczyk <dariuszx.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Added proper paths for examine:
- if lvs loaded, do spdk_lvs_unload
- if lvol created, call spdk_lvol_close instead of spdk_blob_close
Change-Id: I77a2905417d1c53f36b96da3fbea2679d9a2f56d
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/419558
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maciej Szwed <maciej.szwed@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Raid module:
============
- SPDK raid bdev module is a new bdev module which is
responsible for striping various NVMe devices and expose the raid bdev
to bdev layer which would enhance the performance and capacity.
- It can support theoretically 256 base devices (currently it is being
tested max upto 8 base devices)
- Multiple strip sizes like 32KB, 64KB, 128KB, 256KB, 512KB etc is
supported. Most of the current testing is focused on 64KB strip size.
- New RPC commands like "create raid bdev", "destroy raid bdev" and "get raid bdevs"
are introduced to configure raid bdev dynamically in a running
SPDK system.
- Currently raid bdev configuration parameters are persisted in the
current SPDK configuration file for across reboot support. DDF will be
introduced later.
High level testing done:
=======================
- Raid bdev is created with 8 base NVMe devices via configuration
file and is exposed to initiator via existing methods. Initiator is
able to see a single NVMe namespace with capacity equal to sum of the
minimum capacities of 8 devices. Initiator was able to run raw
read/write workload, file system workload etc (tested with XFS file
system workload).
- Multiple raid bdevs are also created and exposed to initiator and
tested with file system and other workloads for read/write IO.
- LVS / LVOL are created over raid bdev and exposed to initiator.
Testing was done for raw read/write workloads and XFS file system
workloads.
- RPC testing is done where on the running SPDK system raid bdevs
are created out of NVMe base devices. These raid bdevs (and LVOLs
over raid bdevs) are then exposed to initiator and IO workload was
tested for raw read/write and XFS file system workload.
- RPC testing is done for delete raid bdevs where all raid bdevs
are deleted in running SPDK system.
- RPC testing is done for get raid bdevs where existing list of
raid bdev names is printed (it can be all raid bdevs or only
online or only configuring or only offline).
- RPC testing is done where raid bdevs and underlying NVMe devices
relationship was returned in JSON RPC commands
Change-Id: I10ae1266f8f2cca3c106e4df8c1c0993ddf435d8
Signed-off-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/410484
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
This is passing a struct lvol_task that is not nested inside a bdev_io
context, which is assumed by lvol_op_comp() in the actual lvol code.
There is no problem currently, since lvol_op_comp() happens to not
dereference the bdev_io except inside of mocked functions and inside a
SPDK_INFOLOG() that does not get executed in the unit tests right now,
but this would break if the lvol code ever actually used the bdev_io
pointer.
Change-Id: Ic3b67f4ecff47e5a98a5be8a83c2524573113aa9
Signed-off-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/418735
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
These errors occur when scan-build is used with clang 6.0 as a backend.
Change-Id: I751a0fd3649ae500887a4dbda1d361104acb7c12
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/418233
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
During spdk_bdev_init, examine_config is called.
This call can claim bdev synchronously, based on
configuration. On spdk_bdev_start if none module
claimed bdev, examine_disk is called and can
perform I/O before claiming bdev.
Signed-off-by: Piotr Pelplinski <piotr.pelplinski@intel.com>
Change-Id: I1448dd368cf3a24a5daccab387d7af7c3d231127
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/413913
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maciej Szwed <maciej.szwed@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Specifically, the errors that occur in scan-build that uses clang-6.0 as
a backend.
Change-Id: I3922a4f65134cbd866fcb27ad9b7a75b6b7803bb
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/418229
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
There's no reason to abort IO that have been queued
due to QoS limits, when QoS is switched from enabled
to disabled. Submit them to the bdev instead.
Fixes issue #357.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: If5eafc53418ac686120e1d6a1da884b42cef845e
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/418128
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell5141@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
This is the more appropriate location for this test
Change-Id: If556b365975f5658a55924aeb7122186961972bd
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/417365
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
This exposes that one of the tests was not expecting
the correct behavior, so also fix that.
Change-Id: Idb73b3ea74950b2e6f959a40e5740375cb76b8c7
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/417364
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
