nvmf/rdma: Correct the comments for handling requsts waiting for the buffer
The code changes, and this is not the second priority. Signed-off-by: Ziye Yang <ziye.yang@intel.com> Change-Id: I08fdac561f2d3f902763c39c37455727aa529b9f Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/5663 Community-CI: Broadcom CI Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9a1cf1c594
commit
ac74de2fe9
@ -2804,7 +2804,7 @@ nvmf_rdma_qpair_process_pending(struct spdk_nvmf_rdma_transport *rtransport,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* The second highest priority is I/O waiting on memory buffers. */
|
||||
/* Then we handle request waiting on memory buffers. */
|
||||
STAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE(req, &rqpair->poller->group->group.pending_buf_queue, buf_link, tmp) {
|
||||
rdma_req = SPDK_CONTAINEROF(req, struct spdk_nvmf_rdma_request, req);
|
||||
if (nvmf_rdma_request_process(rtransport, rdma_req) == false && drain == false) {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user