From ac74de2fe9e1b4ba718ff741be90b0dba7ffe07d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ziye Yang <ziye.yang@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 20:45:49 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] nvmf/rdma: Correct the comments for handling requsts waiting
 for the buffer

The code changes, and this is not the second priority.

Signed-off-by: Ziye Yang <ziye.yang@intel.com>
Change-Id: I08fdac561f2d3f902763c39c37455727aa529b9f
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/5663
Community-CI: Broadcom CI
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
---
 lib/nvmf/rdma.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/nvmf/rdma.c b/lib/nvmf/rdma.c
index 3ef31610c..e4be90d81 100644
--- a/lib/nvmf/rdma.c
+++ b/lib/nvmf/rdma.c
@@ -2804,7 +2804,7 @@ nvmf_rdma_qpair_process_pending(struct spdk_nvmf_rdma_transport *rtransport,
 		}
 	}
 
-	/* The second highest priority is I/O waiting on memory buffers. */
+	/* Then we handle request waiting on memory buffers. */
 	STAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE(req, &rqpair->poller->group->group.pending_buf_queue, buf_link, tmp) {
 		rdma_req = SPDK_CONTAINEROF(req, struct spdk_nvmf_rdma_request, req);
 		if (nvmf_rdma_request_process(rtransport, rdma_req) == false && drain == false) {