Shuhei Matsumoto 42ad32da60 thread: Change if-else_if to switch-case blocks of spdk_poller_pause/resume() ... It will be sufficiently reasonable to check if the caller thread is valid even if spdk_poller_pause() or spdk_poller_resume() does nothing. Besides, let's write all possibles states explicitly in switch - cases. This refactoring clarifies the logic and makes the following patches easier. Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com> Change-Id: I1163eff388fe741d6b6924f474a82b1aa7d18acb Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/7665 Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Konrad Sztyber <konrad.sztyber@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@mellanox.com> Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>		2021-05-13 10:03:44 +00:00
..
Makefile	thread: Add SPDK internal APIs spdk_thread_get_first/next_active/timed/paused_poller()	2021-05-13 10:03:44 +00:00
spdk_thread.map	thread: Add SPDK internal APIs spdk_thread_get_first/next_active/timed/paused_poller()	2021-05-13 10:03:44 +00:00
thread.c	thread: Change if-else_if to switch-case blocks of spdk_poller_pause/resume()	2021-05-13 10:03:44 +00:00