Jim Harris dd474d0286 dpdkbuild: add DPDKBUILD_FLAGS variable ... Some environments (such as a VM on my M1-based MacBook Pro) report CPU with an Implementer+Part Number that DPDK doesn't explicitly support. In my case, it is Implementer ARM (0x41) but no part number (0x0). DPDK doesn't just default to a generic build in this case, it requires the user to specify -Dplatform=generic. We could try to plumb this into a configure option, but for now I'm fine in my dev environment to just specify this DPDKBUILD_FLAGS in my environment to work around it. Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com> Change-Id: I0465e3747de9b1ebacaf4ca53c2e6ccf36db1091 Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/12670 Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com> Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Konrad Sztyber <konrad.sztyber@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Dong Yi <dongx.yi@intel.com>		2022-05-19 13:05:05 +00:00
..
Makefile	dpdkbuild: add DPDKBUILD_FLAGS variable	2022-05-19 13:05:05 +00:00