This function can be useful in places other than accel modules (e.g. to
check if a buffer belongs to accel), so it needs to be declared in
accel.h.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Sztyber <konrad.sztyber@intel.com>
Change-Id: I8fdd58b2ed40dc4a4acce2a8d3e1c5f76944c929
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/16969
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <smatsumoto@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@nvidia.com>
This will allow a platform driver to allocate a buffer in case it cannot
execute the whole sequence and the destination buffer of the last
operation is a "virtual" accel buffer.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Sztyber <konrad.sztyber@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ia947cf553619828a170c5d0563b4c355d7b5ead5
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/16377
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@nvidia.com>
This will allow drivers to check if a task is using buffers from accel
domain. This is just a helper, since the same can be achieved by
calling `spdk_memory_domain_get_first("SPDK_ACCEL_DMA_DEVICE")`, but
there's only a single accel domain and it is a bit special, so it makes
sense to have a dedicated helper function for getting it.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Sztyber <konrad.sztyber@intel.com>
Change-Id: I07db7445ed9b109e66ecdbc0483a6a158a551070
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/16376
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
The goal of a platform driver is to execute chained accel operations in
the most efficient way possible. A driver is aware of the hardware
available on a platform and can execute several operations as a single
one. For instance, if we want to do DMA and then encrypt the data, the
driver can do both at the same time, if the hardware is capable of doing
that.
Platform drivers aren't required to support all operations. If a given
operation cannot be executed, the driver should notify accel to continue
processing a sequence, via spdk_accel_sequence_continue(), and that
operation will processed by a module assigned to its opcode.
It is required however, that all platform drivers support memory
domains, including the "virtual" accel domain. A method for allocating
those buffers will be added in the following patches.
This patch only adds methods to register and select platorm drivers, but
doesn't change the way a sequnce is executed (i.e. it doesn't use the
driver to execute it).
Signed-off-by: Konrad Sztyber <konrad.sztyber@intel.com>
Change-Id: I97a0b07e264601ab3cf980735319fe8cea54d38e
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/16375
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
The data buffers backed by these accel buffers aren't allocated
immediately, but only when they're necessary to execute a given
operation. It allows users to append operations to a sequence, without
actually reserving large space for the data. That way, if some of these
buffers aren't needed to execute a sequence, they won't be allocated.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Sztyber <konrad.sztyber@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ieeea8a011b40c7f2f33e9a6f03fe34264e9316f3
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/15746
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@nvidia.com>
This patch introduces the concept of chaining multiple accel operations
and executing them all at once in a single step. This means that it
will be possible to schedule accel operations at different layers of the
stack (e.g. copy in NVMe-oF transport, crypto in bdev_crypto), but
execute them all in a single place. Thanks to this, we can take
advantage of hardware accelerators that supports executing multiple
operations as a single operation (e.g. copy + crypto).
This operation group is called spdk_accel_sequence and operations can be
appended to that object via one of the spdk_accel_append_* functions.
New operations are always added at the end of a sequence. Users can
specify a callback to be notified when a particular operation in a
sequence is completed, but they don't receive the status of whether it
was successful or not. This is by design, as they shouldn't care about
the status of an individual operation and should rely on other means to
receive the status of the whole sequence. It's also important to note
that any intermediate steps within a sequence may not produce observable
results. For instance, appending a copy from A to B and then a copy
from B to C, it's indeterminate whether A's data will be in B after a
sequence is executed. It is only guaranteed that A's data will be in C.
A sequence can also be reversed using spdk_accel_sequence_reverse(),
meaning that the first operation becomes last and vice versa. It's
especially useful in read paths, as it makes it possible to build the
sequence during submission, then, once the data is read from storage,
reverse the sequence and execute it.
Finally, there are two ways to terminate a sequence: aborting or
executing. It can be aborted via spdk_accel_sequence_abort() which will
execute individual operations' callbacks and free any allocated
resources. To execute it, one must use spdk_accel_sequence_finish().
For now, each operation is executed one by one and is submitted to the
appropriate accel module. Executing multiple operations as a single one
will be added in the future.
Also, currently, only fill and copy operations can be appended to a
sequence. Support for more operations will be added in subsequent
patches.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Sztyber <konrad.sztyber@intel.com>
Change-Id: Id35d093e14feb59b996f780ef77e000e10bfcd20
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/15529
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@nvidia.com>
This is consistent with the use of terms in other parts of SPDK and fits
with the code living under module/
Change-Id: If182f7cf2d160d57443a1b5f24e0065f191b59b2
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/13919
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
The word engine was both used (interchangeably with module) to refer to
the things that plug into the framework and to the framework itself.
This patch eliminates all use of the word engine that meant the
framework. It leaves uses of the word that meant "module".
Change-Id: I6b9b50e2f045ac39f2a74d0152ee8d6269be4bd1
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/13918
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <smatsumoto@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@nvidia.com>
spdk_accel_module_finish
Also move it into the internal header that defines the interface used by
modules.
Change-Id: I3aeb41e643f27a69556099cb8d166f64c9e5d67f
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/13917
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Karas <krzysztof.karas@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <smatsumoto@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
These are 1:1 - they do not need to be separate objects.
Change-Id: I74ab52863f911d9be59ce98e1525302b5bd40846
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/13910
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@nvidia.com>
Docs explaining how to use the RPC are in the next patch in the
series.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: I7dab8fdbeb90cdfde8b3e916ed6d19930ad36e66
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/12848
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
In prep for upcoming patch that will provide an RPC to override
and automatic assignment of an op code to an engine.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: I17d4b962fb376a77f97ce051a513679d0fba698e
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/12829
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
And associated RPC to enable.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: I06785bcd8b8957293ad41d13bab556fe62f29fd5
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/12765
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
We enable multiple engines by:
* getting rid of the globals that point to the one available HW
and one available SW engine
* adding a submit_tasks() entry point for the SW engine so that
it is treated like any other engine allowing us to just call
submit_tasks() to the assigned engine for the opcode instead of
checking what is supported
* changing the definition of engine capabilities from
"HW accelerated" to simply "supported"
* during init, use a global (g_engines_opc) that contains engines
and is indexed by opcode so we know what the best engine is for each
op code
* future patches will add RPC's to override engine priorities or
specifically assign an opcode(s) to an engine.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: I9b9f3d5a2e499124aa7ccf71f0da83c8ee3dd9f9
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/11870
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@nvidia.com>
First in a series of patches that will enable multiple engines
to exist at once and choose the best one based on their priorities
and capabilites, the public API will no longer be needed.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ia87b83aa2263745a94a822a160b6e97bb2e0dc19
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/11948
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Batching will be made available for DSA specifically through the new
idxd_perf tool.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ic51d9ad3692074805b1ffa705cea8be35737c778
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/9846
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Monica Kenguva <monica.kenguva@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Support in accel_perf is coming up in a later patch.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: I63a1d3b9b1a3254fdca78e27c473b9b3468c93c8
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/8202
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Ziye Yang <ziye.yang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@mellanox.com>
Upcoming patches will add support for the idxd engine and
the accel_perf tool. Also following will come vectored support and
batch versions.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: I7223517a844525ad52ed49d65627b04c3cd9fe7c
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/8141
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@mellanox.com>
This patch provides two new accelerated crc32c function interface.
And the next patch will be used to add the real support of chained crc32c feature.
Signed-off-by: Ziye Yang <ziye.yang@intel.com>
Change-Id: I3f8dd55c3da636e29e5fb02fc229b51f05653cd6
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/6456
Community-CI: Broadcom CI
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
The new design:
* Supports a generic batching capability in the accel_fw layer
that keeps track of hw accelerated vs sw commands based on
the capabilities of the engine and processes sw commands in the
generic layer while sending a list of commands (not a batch)
to the engines for processing.
* Batch completions are managed via the generic layer, when using
the accel_fw the engines only process commands. With DSA however,
if a list of commands is sent down it will use the DSA public
API to create and send batches but will rely on the generic layer
to complete the batch task itself. When using DSA directly, batching
works as usual (DSA handles batch completion).
* The engine function tables were greatly simplified by replacing
all of the individual entries (copy, fill, crc32c, etc) with one
`submit_tasks` function that is used to both send lists of tasks
for batches or just one task for single shot API.
* Internally batching is now used to re-submit tasks that were queued
for flow control reasons.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: I99c28751df32017c43490a90f4904bdabe79a270
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/3555
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Since legacy config is being removed, SPDK_ACCEL_MODULE_REGISTER
macro no longer needs field corresponding to processing this
type of configuration.
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
Change-Id: I76ca02487a5fb8f9ecc9d33ac6fa514e7226a03b
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/4636
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@mellanox.com>
Added to the framework as well as all 3 engines. Needed by apps
in the event that they have to fail following the creation of a
batch, allows them to tell the framework to forget about the batch
as they have no intent to send it.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: Id94754ab1350e5a969a5fd2306bd59c38f0a0120
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/3389
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Not needed with new scheme around accel_task in prior patches.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ic6f16654db62fe1dc51b0822f0ff92261da4494c
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/3212
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Also update accel_perf to support it.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ida7b863de02c64239ec4cfbdc3b0235d4e0521f9
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/2954
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Also as a minor drive-by, added verify capability for fill that
wasn't there before, useful in making sure the prep function
was working and really should have been there anyway.
idxd support for prep fill will follow.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ib54311c1fb98abd2fb61df6603cf3c5300b71161
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/2952
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Adds support for both the accel fw and the sw implementation.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ib8748f272a688a074ca475a86dea14179acc020d
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/2928
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Includes a few related changes:
* slight refactor to have common prep function for batch prep
commands in the sw engine
* added support for dualcast batching in accel_perf example app
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: If9f078a0f8eb509d296e60a94331c92a72f8cb10
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/2913
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
This patch only includes the basic framework for batching and the
ability to batch one type of command, copy. Follow-on patches will
add the ability to batch other commands and include an example of
how to do so via the accel perf tool. SW engine support for batching
will also come in a future patch. Documentation will also be coming.
Batching allows the application to submit a list of independent
descriptors to DSA with one single "batch" descriptor. This is beneficial
when the application is in a position to have several operations ready
at once; batching saves the overhead of submitting each one separately.
The way batching works in SPDK is as follows:
1) The app gets a handle to a new batch with spdk_accel_batch_create()
2) The app uses that handle to prepare a command to be included in the
batch. For copy the command is spdk_accel_batch_prep_copy(). The
app many continue to prep commands for the batch up to the max via
calling spdk_accel_batch_get_max()
3) The app then submits the batch with spdk_accel_batch_submit()
4) The callback provided for each command in the batch will be called as
they complete, the callback provided to the batch submit itself will be
called then the entire batch is done.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: I4102e9291fe59a245cedde6888f42a923b6dbafd
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/2248
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Add to both accel framework and add sw engine implementation.
IDXD implementation and accel example app patches to follow.
Dual-cast copies the same source to two separate destination buffers.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: I7df28518505f0d4bbb32cc8e69eb8a231fb29452
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/2127
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Community-CI: Broadcom CI
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Along with the sw engine back end implementation for it. IDXD
back end will follow, the use in the accel perf tool as part
of verify.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ia1013cd884ff71990f898320d6a22e96e16ad2a4
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/2107
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Community-CI: Broadcom CI
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Add the CRC function at the framework level and implement the
software engine back end to use ISAL. The patch series will continue
to include an option for accel_perf to test CRC as well as IDXD
implementation.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: I4eff3bbcf98c0bc2928a48272a57031c8b96394e
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/2072
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Community-CI: Broadcom CI
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@mellanox.com>
This patch also implements the new API for the 3 existing engines.
There was also some minor clean in one file, moving a function to
eliminate multiple forward declarations (there would have been
another one with this new API).
The next patch will use this API in the accel perf tool.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: I4ebc9cb3d1c588919235b5080cbeec29189efa21
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/2025
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Community-CI: Broadcom CI
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
