Many open source projects have moved to using SPDX identifiers
to specify license information, reducing the amount of
boilerplate code in every source file. This patch replaces
the bulk of SPDK .c, .cpp and Makefiles with the BSD-3-Clause
identifier.
Almost all of these files share the exact same license text,
and this patch only modifies the files that contain the
most common license text. There can be slight variations
because the third clause contains company names - most say
"Intel Corporation", but there are instances for Nvidia,
Samsung, Eideticom and even "the copyright holder".
Used a bash script to automate replacement of the license text
with SPDX identifier which is checked into scripts/spdx.sh.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: Iaa88ab5e92ea471691dc298cfe41ebfb5d169780
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/12904
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dong Yi <dongx.yi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Sztyber <konrad.sztyber@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: <qun.wan@intel.com>
This patch is used to add the async network I/O support in
sock layer. If code is configured with I/O uring, --with-uring,
we can use io uring in Linux (version >=5.4-rc3).
PS: We also make VPP's default priority > uring, because
for the iSCSI or sock test linked with VPP. It tests VPP with
a given address (which is not a special VPP can only open address),
so using uring can also listen those address succefully. And if we make
uring with priority > VPP, actually, VPP will not tested in those cases.
Additionally, the current CI pool is not ready for test, we need
wait for the CI system ready. And I test on my local platform, it works.
Signed-off-by: Ziye Yang <ziye.yang@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ie8ee3c8ddf8d2a7264f2b382376733e002816dcc
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/952
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>