Many open source projects have moved to using SPDX identifiers
to specify license information, reducing the amount of
boilerplate code in every source file. This patch replaces
the bulk of SPDK .c, .cpp and Makefiles with the BSD-3-Clause
identifier.
Almost all of these files share the exact same license text,
and this patch only modifies the files that contain the
most common license text. There can be slight variations
because the third clause contains company names - most say
"Intel Corporation", but there are instances for Nvidia,
Samsung, Eideticom and even "the copyright holder".
Used a bash script to automate replacement of the license text
with SPDX identifier which is checked into scripts/spdx.sh.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: Iaa88ab5e92ea471691dc298cfe41ebfb5d169780
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/12904
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dong Yi <dongx.yi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Sztyber <konrad.sztyber@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: <qun.wan@intel.com>
Add a simple tool, poller_perf, to evaluate cost to run non-timed
poller or timed poller by any period, number of pollers.
struct spdk_thread and struct spdk_thread_stats can have the count
of poller runs but we do not have any particular use case for it.
So the poller_perf tool use its global counter for now.
By following similar tools, event_perf and reactor_perf, run
poller_perf once for non-timed poller and once for timed poller.
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Change-Id: Ic5b297bb23d0cd0dc1313e1638ac540ffd5fb8f8
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/8925
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
