Previously, the difference between configuring and offline is
unclear, this patch just fixes it. The key difference should be
whether the raid bdev have ever registered. Offline is registered
before but unregistered now, and configuring has never registered.
According to the above, we should never set configuring raid bdev to
offline because it never got registered.
Change-Id: Id44ef6654e032993ffb8444e7e7ae3e43a9b0f16
Signed-off-by: wuzhouhui <wuzhouhui@kingsoft.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/428321
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Use helper function raid_bdev_config_find_by_name() in destroy_raid_bdev
RPC.
Besides, unify two iterator variables in construct_raid_bdev RPC.
This is too small to add in a separate patch.
Change-Id: If0bbae8993af4e402a82299db378e89245b8966e
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424150
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Initialization of bdev modules don't have fixed ordering.
Hence both cases should succeed to create configured raid bdev
for .INI config file.
1. create raid bdev and then create base bdevs of it.
2. before creating raid bdev, create base bdevs of it.
To do this, factor out adding base bdevs to raid bdev
to a helper function raid_bdev_add_base_devices() first
and then apply it to construct_raid_bdev RPC and parse .INI
config file.
Change-Id: I4389fd4e7bd41296dfa9210bbe8b60348ee5bc9d
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423769
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
When construct_raid_bdev RPC is callled, even if all adding base bdevs
to it fail, a raid bdev with no base bdev should exist and be in
the configuring state.
Extract raid_bdev_create() from raid_bdev_add_base_bdev() and put it
before starting iteration of raid_bdev_add_base_bdev().
This change cam be applied to .INI config file too.
Change-Id: Ia71aca0bbdb33049fe5bd9b8fd8163c99c032401
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424148
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
buf is no longer needed, now that RAID I/O will never
span a strip boundary.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: Icc03b985f540797597c238005bf9883f6f8ad010
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423406
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Now that I/O never span a strip boundary, we don't
need to count splits.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: Iea5df5ca055fe4b338fb5cb0828a45502c239458
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423325
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
When a raid bdev is constructed by JSON-RPC construct_raid_bdev,
information about config and slot can be passed to
raid_bdev_add_base_device() and raid_bdev_can_claim() doesn't have
to be called.
Hence extract raid_bdev_can_claim_bdev() from raid_bdev_add_base_device()
and put it to raid_bdev_examine().
Change-Id: I92e02bf3661cb97b691246f32198ba946810d96c
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423618
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
raid_base_bdev_config is suffciently descriptive as name and so
"name" can be used as the name of the base bdev.
Other structs have used "name" as the name of bdev.
Change-Id: I090ef541a84fd14d9ec3bfebbdc96ae649709551
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423614
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
According to the purpose of the lists, state_link and global_link
will be enough to understand the purpose well.
Besides, in raid_bdev_remove_base_bdev(), if any entry is not removed
during iteration, TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE() is not necessary. Hence
change TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE to TAILQ_FOREACH for this case.
Change-Id: I3022c58faf96721df9241e07dbb5a06d7de89e70
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423056
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Other helper functions raid_bdev_free_base_bdev_resource() and
raid_bdev_cleanup() can be used in check_and_remove_raid_bdev().
Change-Id: I24ce02371f5bb29c3b6111da4475a9ad08e65c21
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/422794
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
struct raid_bdev has a pointer raid_bdev_config to its configuration,
but raid_bdev is duplicated between raid_bdev and raid_bdev_config
and just config may be enough as a name.
Change-Id: I77f6a69b913cd540c22f05803c486a4caf103f24
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/422923
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
In bdev_raid.c and bdev_raid_rpc.c, to hold a pointer to
raid_bdev_config, some have used raid_cfg and other have used
raid_bdev_config.
raid_bdev_config is the name of the struct and using the name of
the struct as a pointer to it may cause any confusion.
Change-Id: Ic87ff04d58ea46c30081aaae8d9cda5a53135be9
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/422922
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
base_bdevs_io_channel is good but base_channel may be enough and
fit other bdev modules.
Change-Id: I67a1d224f1ef4ca1fc048b4325333f2552a37150
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/422921
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
raid_base_bdev_info is sufficiently descriptive as name and so
names of member variables in raid_base_bdev_info can be simplified.
Change-Id: I759a758ec0f3ac21de767ad379a902f1b04cc66d
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/422919
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
During IO submission, raid_bdev can be get by bdev_io->bdev->ctxt.
Hence holding raid_bdev in raid_bdev_io_channel is duplicated.
Change-Id: I722432718aca8c5846541816b6ecca56821d77f6
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/421182
Reviewed-by: Dariusz Stojaczyk <dariuszx.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: GangCao <gang.cao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Locating spdk_bdev structure to the beginning of raid_bdev structure
will simplify the hierarchy and match other bdev modules.
Change-Id: I1bfbf773bc96a4f144e6bff772ade05bb42762e9
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/420818
Reviewed-by: Dariusz Stojaczyk <dariuszx.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Raid module:
============
- SPDK raid bdev module is a new bdev module which is
responsible for striping various NVMe devices and expose the raid bdev
to bdev layer which would enhance the performance and capacity.
- It can support theoretically 256 base devices (currently it is being
tested max upto 8 base devices)
- Multiple strip sizes like 32KB, 64KB, 128KB, 256KB, 512KB etc is
supported. Most of the current testing is focused on 64KB strip size.
- New RPC commands like "create raid bdev", "destroy raid bdev" and "get raid bdevs"
are introduced to configure raid bdev dynamically in a running
SPDK system.
- Currently raid bdev configuration parameters are persisted in the
current SPDK configuration file for across reboot support. DDF will be
introduced later.
High level testing done:
=======================
- Raid bdev is created with 8 base NVMe devices via configuration
file and is exposed to initiator via existing methods. Initiator is
able to see a single NVMe namespace with capacity equal to sum of the
minimum capacities of 8 devices. Initiator was able to run raw
read/write workload, file system workload etc (tested with XFS file
system workload).
- Multiple raid bdevs are also created and exposed to initiator and
tested with file system and other workloads for read/write IO.
- LVS / LVOL are created over raid bdev and exposed to initiator.
Testing was done for raw read/write workloads and XFS file system
workloads.
- RPC testing is done where on the running SPDK system raid bdevs
are created out of NVMe base devices. These raid bdevs (and LVOLs
over raid bdevs) are then exposed to initiator and IO workload was
tested for raw read/write and XFS file system workload.
- RPC testing is done for delete raid bdevs where all raid bdevs
are deleted in running SPDK system.
- RPC testing is done for get raid bdevs where existing list of
raid bdev names is printed (it can be all raid bdevs or only
online or only configuring or only offline).
- RPC testing is done where raid bdevs and underlying NVMe devices
relationship was returned in JSON RPC commands
Change-Id: I10ae1266f8f2cca3c106e4df8c1c0993ddf435d8
Signed-off-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/410484
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
