Vhost testing crashed from Nightly testing, because a member
access within null pointer of type 'struct ibv_send_wr'.
Change-Id: If8f34f23864883ea73516d2d1fe3b30137c04316
Signed-off-by: Hailiang Wang <hailiangx.e.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/458913
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Unsetting this flag will decrease the number of WRs retrieved during CQ polling and will decrease
the oeverall processing time. Since RDMA_WRITE operations are always paired with RDMA_SEND (response),
it is possible to track the number of outstanding WRs relying on the completed response WR.
Completed WRs of type RDMA_WR_TYPE_DATA are now always RDMA_READ operations.
The patch shows %2 better peformance for read operations on x86 machine. The performance was measured using perf with the following parameters:
-q 16 -o 4096 -w read -t 300 -c 2
with nvme null device, each measurement was done 4 times
avg IOPS (with patch): 865861.71
avg IOPS (master): 847958.77
avg latency (with patch): 18.46 [us]
avg latency (master): 18.85 [us]
Change-Id: Ifd3329fbd0e45dd5f27213b36b9444308660fc8b
Signed-off-by: Alexey Marchuk <alexeymar@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Kotchubievsky <sashakot@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Kochetov <evgeniik@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/456469
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell5141@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
This matches the Linux kernel target. Users can
still decrease this default when creating the
transport (i.e. -p option for nvmf_create_transport
in rpc.py).
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: Icad59350a2cd35cfc4ad76d06399345191680c05
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/454820
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell5141@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
We could run into issues with this if we were using an arbitrarily large
amount of cores to run SPDK.
Change-Id: Ia7add027d7e6ef1ccb4a69ac328dbdf4f2751fd8
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/452250
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
This will help us not iterate through the whole list of connections when
only some of them have pending recvs.
Change-Id: I681bc98befbdda4e77ef333b7a086c08b2708eb3
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/449266
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
This will help save MMIO overhead. Especially in the SRQ case.
Change-Id: I6fb70cf6de4763450f97961f41ccdce3acec2e63
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/449265
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
By creating a list of qpairs, we can avoid looping over every connected
qpair to process sends each time we poll.
Change-Id: If24bbc363176f52fbfb756d56719edd885a21a11
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/449264
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
By batching ibv sends each time we poll, we can reduce the number of
MMIO writes that we do.
Change-Id: Ia5a07b0037365abfa8732629c34d34a9ed49ac70
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/449253
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
There are cases where srq can be a detriment. Add a flag to allow users
to disable srq even if they have a piece of hardware that supports it.
Change-Id: Ia3be8e8c8e8463964e6ff1c02b07afbf4c3cc8f7
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/452271
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
This restriction helps reduce the amount of padding when
printing out the event trace, allowing it to fit in a
small number of columns.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ifa31e5a6967c7b9bc7028069effb71533f80596f
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/452736
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
This was not used by any of the trace register descriptions.
Let's remove it rather keeping it around if we don't need it.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: Idda809e2911db5be555ff6aa13695484a14bf665
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/452734
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
We can use the rpoller->srq to check if a qpair is valid when processing
recv completions.
Change-Id: I6aa360adc48a3312ddcf79f10e2a65b502a7314f
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/452247
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Mempools are based off of a ring structure which allocates its elements
as a power of two. It also only exposes n-1 elements to the user. So
when we create a mempool with 2^n elements in it, we have to allocate a
ring with 2^n+1 entries. By decreasing the number of elements in these
key mempools by 1, we can save a decent amount of memory.
Change-Id: I942c9dd4cf59096969bc2559fb46fd2084a07f09
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/448875
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
It used to be that we would get async events very infrequently. However,
with the introduction of SRQ, this number has gone up tremendously.
Change the way we report our these events so that we don't spam/confuse
people running the target.
Change-Id: I33070281fa854cbc17784d61bbbb870196ca8780
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/452159
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
If there are outstanding recvs for a qpair when it is destroyed, we need
to clear the qpair from it before reposting it. Otehrwise, we have a
potential heap-use-after-free of double free (depending on whether the
recv completion is in error state or not).
See github issues #730
Change-Id: Ic2009c761cbcc5e89174f62fbd0872d0489c67ca
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/452122
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
We were setting this value in the target from our initiator, but it
turns out the rdma_conn_params struct is responsible for setting the
opposite side so we need to add it in the target side when accepting
connections.
Also, add a test to demonstrate target functionality when we overwhelm
the SRQ. It is useful to note that performance really tanks when you
start overwhelming the srq so it may be useful to use this test case to
check performance gains in edge cases over time.
Change-Id: Iac541bd9fc1d82eca9f21e7abc3f625663a6c460
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/451678
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
We were incrementing over the end of the descriptor list and assigning
undefined values to the rsp opcode in SEND_WITH_INVAL case. We were only
hitting this error when mixing sgl and inline requests in the same
workload. We were just by chance hitting a four bit value that was set
to all 1s from the in capsule data from the last request.
Change-Id: Ied06356f3d22fa34a2cd869dfad6bdca8720791d
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/450873
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
This was not being properly set in the multi-sgl path.
Also add a verification step to the fio configuration file to prevent
against future regressions.
Change-Id: I510b6acd92bc2fbc9b6fbec1d59945cc53584ad3
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/450305
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Rqpair qp and resources maybe not be created, if rqpair fail to
initialise. For example, in function new_qpair, the code run to
spdk_nvmf_qpair_disconnect, but rqpair is initialised in
poll_group_add.
Fix#557 segmentaion fault(core dump)
Change-Id: I1892e6d13e2d53dd5a7c4856d775f9b3b85da961
Signed-off-by: JinYu <jin.yu@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/450986
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell5141@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hailiang Wang <hailiangx.e.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
If rsp->status.sc != SUCCESS and xfer == DATA_CONTROLLER_TO_HOST,
We would not send the data WR, so clean the num_outstanding_data_wr.
Fix#728
Change-Id: I32259788e495ed76f8f02a9d871bd56356d93dc4
Signed-off-by: JinYu <jin.yu@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/450726
Reviewed-by: Ziye Yang <ziye.yang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell5141@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Should speed up operations, and allows us to remove the 16 byte link
object from the request structure.
Change-Id: Ie62df1f44d22580a7a7ae41c498295841d1e3064
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/448080
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
We were only using one enum from this whole struct, so there is no need
to store it. Plus the queries we use to update it are so infrequent and
only occur during connect and disconnect so I think we can save quite a
bit of space by removing this without compromising performance.
Change-Id: Icf29977a3c10cb289564fa2760a0059f07a0f8cb
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/448072
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
There was a lot of duplicated code here between states. I'm trying to
minimize the duplicated code without making it confusing.
Change-Id: I13183431e554c8a9f501b3385bbd7b59e2c83161
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/448066
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Catch an edge case where a multi sgl request is longer than the allowed
transfer size.
Change-Id: I79779050fe951d16f1240e2c3d8cf5037e576ea2
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/440766
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
This is important to avoid thrash when we don't have enough buffers to
satisfy a request.
Change-Id: Id35fd492078b8e628c2118317f674f07e95d4dba
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/449109
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
The buffers are really specific to the request and not the wr or data
object. In the case of multiple wr requests, the maximum number of
buffers per req is equal to the number of SGEs in the NVMe-oF request
*2.
Change-Id: Ic59498bfed461d180adb2fb9a481ac5b11fa9252
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/449108
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Enable parsing an nvmf request that contains an inline
nvme_sgl_last_segment_descriptor element. This is the next step
towards NVMe-oF SGL support in the NVMe-oF target.
Change-Id: Ia2f1f7054e0de8a9e2bfe4dabe6af4085e3f12c4
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/428745
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Changing i to iovcnt in all references to the req->iov structure will be
important when we start processing multi-sgl requests.
Change-Id: I90a9b6d872b94f846ae7d29a45dd2703eafa6175
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/449201
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
This will be used by the multi-sgl version of this function as well.
Change-Id: Iafeba4836a77482fa2a158f86f1c17fe7fdeb510
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/449104
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
This event is generated by NICs utilizing the SRQ feature when the last
RECV for that qpair is processed. I have confirmed this feature.
Change-Id: Ib6d6b6d02987f789b4d5dd3daf734e3351ee1974
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/448063
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
With ASAN to run this cases, it will report issue about heap used after free
in spdk_nvmf_rdma_qpair_destroy. Resources have been released before,
change the order to in this tailq to release resources.
ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address
0x6080000080e0 at pc 0x0000006e1e3f bp 0x7fd48b6c3df0 sp 0x7fd48b6c3de0
READ of size 8 at 0x6080000080e0 thread T3 (reactor_1)
0x6e1e3e in spdk_nvmf_rdma_qpair_destroy spdk/lib/nvmf/rdma.c:813
Change-Id: Ia1c12bca84955a2de60399e6b265c9b8901bb51e
Signed-off-by: yidong0635 <dongx.yi@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/448534
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell5141@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Not doing so can cause us to hit asserts during the shutdown path. This
should fix an intermittent failure we are seeing on the test pool where
we hit the assert rdma_req->state != RDMA_REQUEST_STATE_FREE in
spdk_nvmf_rdma_request_process.
Note that this problem doesn't cause any data corruption when debug is
not enabled, it just causes us to probcess a subset of commands through
the state machine one extra time suring qpair shutdown.
Change-Id: Ibc36bfea87ec4089b8e2c7a915f48714fddb0b09
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/447843
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
This will become important later on.
Change-Id: I94e5af03359e476afbc68664e43f44269ad5974c
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/448074
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
When we have a shared receive queue, the number of outstanding items
associated with a completion queue is deterministic, and limited by how
many RECVs we have total in the SRQ. So, we can set the total size of
the Completion queue at the beginning of time and never resize it.
Change-Id: I787e4c5bbd52ac8948a323d1301f926f887cd91c
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/447492
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Consolidating error paths is common practice in SPDK so do that here to
make the function more uniform and save space.
Change-Id: I98c5d5f7feeb688f1d8b24f4d2d3461a43d00c1d
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/448191
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
This unifies the clean up path between SRQ and normal
operation.
Change-Id: I396d7e3749579f27b5bb1e89b9d6761a77ba5beb
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/446979
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Depending on whether SRQ is enabled, resources may be allocated
to the rqpair or to the rpoller. Create a struct to hold these
pointers that can be used in both locations to avoid duplicated
code.
Change-Id: I2c8fc59009201d9e41721e6462a81732b529a9e0
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/446978
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eugene Kochetov <evgeniik@mellanox.com>
This wasn't used anywhere.
Change-Id: I405af3c808be284d19218f3f04c1e90e33e31de8
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/446977
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Ziye Yang <ziye.yang@intel.com>
We were only using one pd per device anywas, and this is necessary for
shared receive queue support.
Change-Id: I86668d5b7256277fe50836863408af2215b5adf9
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/447385
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Both Mellanox and Soft-RoCE NICs work with this approach.
Change-Id: I7b05e54037761c4d5e58484e1c55934c47ac1ab9
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/446134
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Not all RDMA drivers fail back the dummy recv and send operations that
we send to them when destroying a qpair. We still need to free the
resources from these qpairs to avoid eating up all of the system memory
after multiple connect and disconnect events. Since we won't be getting
any more completions, the best heuristic we can use is waiting a long
time and then freeing the resources.
qpair_fini is only called from the proper polling thread so we can safely
call process_pending to flush the qpair before closing it out.
Change-Id: I61e6931d7316d1e78bad26657bb671aa451e29f4
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/443057
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
In the error path, we were first decrementing a variable and then
asserting that it must be >0. These operations should occur in the
opposite order.
Change-Id: I6cec544faf17bb75cbfca3d3a3c173dc5db14f99
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/446440
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: yidong0635 <dongx.yi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
When the decision was made to uncouple the number of shared buffers from
the queue depth and allow the user to decide for themselves, the default
was also significantly lowered, which caused some issues when trying
torun performance tests (See https://github.com/spdk/spdk/issues/699).
While this is a user modifiable variable, it is still best to keep the
higher default value.
The original value was equivalent to max_queue_depth *
SPDK_NVMF_MAX_SGL_ENTRIES * 2 with the defaults for max_queue depth and
max_sgl_entries being 128 and 16 respectively. Hence 4096
fixes: 0b20f2e552
Change-Id: I809e97a10973093a2b485b85bca7160091166f70
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/446525
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
