Previous test cases got passed, is because all parameters
are filtered to be same accidentally, for example:
Previous, they are
event=bdev_register:66ab4189
ev_type=bdev_register:66ab4189
ev_ctx=bdev_register:66ab4189
ex_ev_type='bdev_register:[[:alnum:]-]+'
ex_ev_ctx='bdev_register:[[:alnum:]-]+'
But actually they should be:
event=bdev_register:66ab4189
ev_type=bdev_register
ev_ctx=66ab4189
ex_ev_type='bdev_register'
ex_ev_ctx='[[:alnum:]-]+'
Change-Id: I7a2dc801931f792a39fc2775d883679cf8185fd0
Signed-off-by: Liu Xiaodong <xiaodong.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/454442
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Kulasek <tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
I'm guessing this happened during a refactor a while back, just
noticed it while looking at something else. We create a PT bdev
on a malloc bdev that was never created.
Change-Id: Idda7448b908c184f31be3ac1dd076f1cdf3397ed
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/452778
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
We use JSON configuration test already configure every subsystem so we
piggyback notifications testing here to not duplicate work.
Change-Id: Ib1334951fba60de390e6b40f653cf9cc1d32c144
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Kulasek <tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Pawel Wodkowski <pawelx.wodkowski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Karol Latecki <karol.latecki@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/445337
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
In some situation, the script needs to try more times to kill
spdk_tgt. So increase the loop count.
Change-Id: I5c3596b0bae8ee965bb0b3532ba100dfd0aec82d
Signed-off-by: Liang Yan <liang.z.yan@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/445436
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
This patch rework all JSON config file reading tests. This is needed as
current approach will require to modify each test to re-launch SPDK
applications for each test type. This is hard to do because tests are
not flexible and will require to be rewritten almost from scratch. Not
metioning time to relaunch each test separatly.
Instead, just replace all old tests with one test. Launch only one
target and only one initiator. Then configure it using RPC calls. Then
config is dumped and target and initiator application is relaunched to
reread the configuration from file. Then config is dumped again and
compared.
Change-Id: Id857089aed0e6f2197cbf3ae625a4e9f4b13e8bb
Signed-off-by: Pawel Wodkowski <pawelx.wodkowski@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/432318
Reviewed-by: Karol Latecki <karol.latecki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pawel Kaminski <pawelx.kaminski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
