According to the purpose of the lists, state_link and global_link
will be enough to understand the purpose well.
Besides, in raid_bdev_remove_base_bdev(), if any entry is not removed
during iteration, TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE() is not necessary. Hence
change TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE to TAILQ_FOREACH for this case.
Change-Id: I3022c58faf96721df9241e07dbb5a06d7de89e70
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423056
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
struct raid_bdev has a pointer raid_bdev_config to its configuration,
but raid_bdev is duplicated between raid_bdev and raid_bdev_config
and just config may be enough as a name.
Change-Id: I77f6a69b913cd540c22f05803c486a4caf103f24
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/422923
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
base_bdevs_io_channel is good but base_channel may be enough and
fit other bdev modules.
Change-Id: I67a1d224f1ef4ca1fc048b4325333f2552a37150
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/422921
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
raid_base_bdev_info is sufficiently descriptive as name and so
names of member variables in raid_base_bdev_info can be simplified.
Change-Id: I759a758ec0f3ac21de767ad379a902f1b04cc66d
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/422919
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
A number of modules (RAID, logical volumes) have logical
"stripes" that require splitting an I/O into several
child I/O. For example, on a RAID-0 with 128KB strip size,
an I/O that spans a 128KB boundary will require sending
one I/O for the portion that comes before the boundary to
one member disk, and another I/O for the portion that comes
after the boundary to another member disk. Logical volumes
are similar - data is allocated in clusters, so an I/O that
spans a cluster boundary may need to be split since the
clusters may not be contiguous on disk.
Putting the splitting logic in the common bdev layer ensures
bdev module authors don't have to always do this themselves.
This is especially helpful for cases like splitting an I/O
described by many iovs - we can simplify this a lot by
handling it in the common bdev layer.
Note that currently we will only submit one child I/O
at a time. This could be improved later to submit multiple
child I/O in parallel, but the complexity in the iov splitting
code also increases a lot.
Note: Some Intel NVMe SSDs have a similar characteristic.
We will not use this bdev stripe feature for NVMe though -
we want to primarily use the splitting functionality inside
of the NVMe driver itself to ensure it remains fully
functional. Many SPDK users use the NVMe driver without
the bdev layer.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ife804ecc56f6b2b55345a0d0ae9fda9e68632b3b
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423024
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
A new unit test in an upcoming patch will initialize the bdev
layer separately, so modify the existing tests now so that
they properly cleanup the bdev layer after the unit test
that initialized it is complete.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ie00837a90391ca4d0dd578e978fb26483fe5c0cf
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423023
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
So we don't need to allocate memory (maybe failed) just for free other
memory.
Change-Id: I2c83f6acc2aa6ed79455bff90f952a2e70b44d59
Signed-off-by: wuzhouhui <wuzhouhui@kingsoft.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/422203
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
The intents of these arrays was to keep track in the
bdev layer of all base<->virtual bdev relationships -
i.e. which member disk bdevs make up a RAID bdev,
which logical volume bdevs are associated with a
bdev that contains an lvolstore, etc.
Currently none of this is used however. And trying
to keep track in the bdev layer instead of asking
the bdev modules for the relationships has a number
of complications. Early one, we tried to do this
with TAILQs - but that doesn't work since this can't
be done with a single TAILQ_ENTRY in the bdev
structures. So we moved to arrays - that works a bit
better, but then the pointer arrays have to be
realloc'd which isn't ideal.
The biggest problem though with these arrays is that
they held bdev pointers - not bdev descriptor pointers.
It's not really valid to access bdevs without a
descriptor - the descriptors are what make sure active
references are accounted for when a bdev is hotplugged.
Of course the bdev layer knows when a bdev is getting
removed and could go and do the updates to these
arrays separately - but that just seems very convoluted.
So for now just remove these arrays completely. If
there is a future need for the bdev layer to
understand relationships between bdevs, we can add
module APIs so that the generic layer can ask
the modules about the relationships.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I99ef1068240bff1262f64f234260cf2fb44df51d
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/420932
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: GangCao <gang.cao@intel.com>
When an SPDK application shuts down, the bdev layer will
automatically unregister all of the bdevs to ensure they
are properly quiesced and cleaned up.
Some modules may want to perform different operations when
a bdev is destructed during normal runtime vs. shutdown.
For example, for lvol, when the last lvol is cleaned up,
it should unload the lvolstore, release and close the bdev
that contains the lvolstore. You never want to do this
during normal runtime though - it is perfectly valid to
have an lvolstore that contains no lvols. RAID and future
bdev modules such as multipath have similar use cases.
So add a new bdev module callback named "fini_start".
If a module specifies a function pointer for this callback,
the bdev layer will call it before it starts the bdev
unregistrations.
This enables some future patches to the bdev layer such
that it will always unregister block devices that are not
claimed (i.e. logical volumes) before block devices that
are claimed (i.e. the bdev containing an lvolstore).
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I6e87f5c2b27f16731ea5def858f26e882a29495a
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/421175
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
During IO submission, raid_bdev can be get by bdev_io->bdev->ctxt.
Hence holding raid_bdev in raid_bdev_io_channel is duplicated.
Change-Id: I722432718aca8c5846541816b6ecca56821d77f6
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/421182
Reviewed-by: Dariusz Stojaczyk <dariuszx.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: GangCao <gang.cao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Locating spdk_bdev structure to the beginning of raid_bdev structure
will simplify the hierarchy and match other bdev modules.
Change-Id: I1bfbf773bc96a4f144e6bff772ade05bb42762e9
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/420818
Reviewed-by: Dariusz Stojaczyk <dariuszx.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Use strdup for all strings allocated by JSON decoder and free them on
all paths.
Change-Id: Ia30d32c2fd6bd79f62588ca19bd3bb093d38a502
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/420325
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
For front-ends like iSCSI (and NVMe-oF in the future)
which want the backend to specify the data buffer, the
RAID module doesn't copy the pointer to the allocated
buffer from the child IO back to the parent IO. It
really can't copy the pointer - the child IO owns it
and will free it.
So the RAID module needs to allocate the buffer first
and then pass it down.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I3b1eceac9b1cdd26130e59e1d400c9869a19f881
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/420677
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Since destroy_lvol_bdev was implemented, it is now more convinient
to call destroy/unload for lvol store explicitly.
Rather than using lvs struct to pass a request checked on each
lvol close/destroy.
Change-Id: I56ee626e96f8752909d1584a20fe3345c5607fdc
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/420285
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ziye Yang <optimistyzy@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
This patch fixes lvol delete behaviour.
First, we look if there are any dependencies that disallow lvol deletion.
If there are any (i.e. dependent clones) we fail.
Otherwise we delete lvol and unregister associated bdev.
destroy_bdev no longer deletes lvol.
Fixes#345
Signed-off-by: Piotr Pelplinski <piotr.pelplinski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
Change-Id: I99e6abded2ed3ae2742103f81fc7eb937ad1cab4
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/407402
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Previously on all ut_lvol_* tests, creation of lvs was mocked.
There is no reason to keep it that way instead of creating
actual lvs using same code that is unit tested.
Change-Id: Id0a7816da0c195d596a6da516471b3f46bb4e475
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/419562
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maciej Szwed <maciej.szwed@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
This variable was unnecessary since one within lvs->bs_dev
can be used to verify functionality and within stubs.
Change-Id: I43e12236e08f70381e0da5730b760db4ec3c577b
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/419561
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maciej Szwed <maciej.szwed@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell5141@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Those did not affect the tests, thus can be removed.
Change-Id: Ic1a23d4a40a0b5af1a2aff770e6eb4f0614c8f04
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/419560
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maciej Szwed <maciej.szwed@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Dariusz Stojaczyk <dariuszx.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Added proper paths for examine:
- if lvs loaded, do spdk_lvs_unload
- if lvol created, call spdk_lvol_close instead of spdk_blob_close
Change-Id: I77a2905417d1c53f36b96da3fbea2679d9a2f56d
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/419558
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maciej Szwed <maciej.szwed@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Raid module:
============
- SPDK raid bdev module is a new bdev module which is
responsible for striping various NVMe devices and expose the raid bdev
to bdev layer which would enhance the performance and capacity.
- It can support theoretically 256 base devices (currently it is being
tested max upto 8 base devices)
- Multiple strip sizes like 32KB, 64KB, 128KB, 256KB, 512KB etc is
supported. Most of the current testing is focused on 64KB strip size.
- New RPC commands like "create raid bdev", "destroy raid bdev" and "get raid bdevs"
are introduced to configure raid bdev dynamically in a running
SPDK system.
- Currently raid bdev configuration parameters are persisted in the
current SPDK configuration file for across reboot support. DDF will be
introduced later.
High level testing done:
=======================
- Raid bdev is created with 8 base NVMe devices via configuration
file and is exposed to initiator via existing methods. Initiator is
able to see a single NVMe namespace with capacity equal to sum of the
minimum capacities of 8 devices. Initiator was able to run raw
read/write workload, file system workload etc (tested with XFS file
system workload).
- Multiple raid bdevs are also created and exposed to initiator and
tested with file system and other workloads for read/write IO.
- LVS / LVOL are created over raid bdev and exposed to initiator.
Testing was done for raw read/write workloads and XFS file system
workloads.
- RPC testing is done where on the running SPDK system raid bdevs
are created out of NVMe base devices. These raid bdevs (and LVOLs
over raid bdevs) are then exposed to initiator and IO workload was
tested for raw read/write and XFS file system workload.
- RPC testing is done for delete raid bdevs where all raid bdevs
are deleted in running SPDK system.
- RPC testing is done for get raid bdevs where existing list of
raid bdev names is printed (it can be all raid bdevs or only
online or only configuring or only offline).
- RPC testing is done where raid bdevs and underlying NVMe devices
relationship was returned in JSON RPC commands
Change-Id: I10ae1266f8f2cca3c106e4df8c1c0993ddf435d8
Signed-off-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/410484
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
This is passing a struct lvol_task that is not nested inside a bdev_io
context, which is assumed by lvol_op_comp() in the actual lvol code.
There is no problem currently, since lvol_op_comp() happens to not
dereference the bdev_io except inside of mocked functions and inside a
SPDK_INFOLOG() that does not get executed in the unit tests right now,
but this would break if the lvol code ever actually used the bdev_io
pointer.
Change-Id: Ic3b67f4ecff47e5a98a5be8a83c2524573113aa9
Signed-off-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/418735
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
These errors occur when scan-build is used with clang 6.0 as a backend.
Change-Id: I751a0fd3649ae500887a4dbda1d361104acb7c12
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/418233
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
During spdk_bdev_init, examine_config is called.
This call can claim bdev synchronously, based on
configuration. On spdk_bdev_start if none module
claimed bdev, examine_disk is called and can
perform I/O before claiming bdev.
Signed-off-by: Piotr Pelplinski <piotr.pelplinski@intel.com>
Change-Id: I1448dd368cf3a24a5daccab387d7af7c3d231127
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/413913
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maciej Szwed <maciej.szwed@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Specifically, the errors that occur in scan-build that uses clang-6.0 as
a backend.
Change-Id: I3922a4f65134cbd866fcb27ad9b7a75b6b7803bb
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/418229
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
There's no reason to abort IO that have been queued
due to QoS limits, when QoS is switched from enabled
to disabled. Submit them to the bdev instead.
Fixes issue #357.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: If5eafc53418ac686120e1d6a1da884b42cef845e
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/418128
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell5141@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
This is the more appropriate location for this test
Change-Id: If556b365975f5658a55924aeb7122186961972bd
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/417365
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
This exposes that one of the tests was not expecting
the correct behavior, so also fix that.
Change-Id: Idb73b3ea74950b2e6f959a40e5740375cb76b8c7
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/417364
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
I missed this one in the initial series.
Change-Id: Id4dc7574a04cd964455852f1a00084b65ab989b3
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/416253
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Move the status field into the internal structure.
Change-Id: Icf96436925dd829ee89d2491ef55e337823be6fb
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/416057
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
This function is intended to be used when an spdk_bdev
I/O operation (such as spdk_bdev_write or spdk_bdev_write_blocks)
fails due to spdk_bdev_io buffer exhaustion. The caller
can queue an spdk_bdev_io_wait structure on the calling thread
which will be invoked when an spdk_bdev_io buffer is available.
While here, turn off error messages in bdev.c related to
spdk_bdev_io pool exhaustion, since we now have an API designed
to gracefully recover from it.
Also modify bdevperf as an example of how to use this new API.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ia55f6582dc5a8d6d8bcc74689fd846d742324510
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/415074
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ziye Yang <optimistyzy@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
This patch is to add the core control policy for the
bandwidth rate limit (max bytes per second). Change
the existing functions for a common name and specially
handle the case when IOPS and bandwidth rate limiting
are both enabled.
Change-Id: I9f4565958d472559ef6d8bea52b1fe2a5f3c8969
Signed-off-by: GangCao <gang.cao@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/413821
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
To support the bandwidth rate limiting besides the IOPS rate
limiting, this patch is to add the support of the configuration
parse. The format will be as following to have a 10 (10M)
on the Malloc0 bdev. The default unit is in MB.
Limit_BWPS Malloc0 10
Change-Id: I62d70391ccad7804e6673ec56a3ed1cb0a4fbbd4
Signed-off-by: GangCao <gang.cao@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/413652
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Add a new function and its RPC caller. By using it, we can
get the statistics of all the bdevs or the specified bdev.
Meanwhile, with this patch, the open source tool 'sysstat/iostat'
can support for SPDK. The 'iostat' tool can call this function to
get the statistics of all the SPDK managed devices via the rpc
interface.
Change-Id: I135a7bbd49d923014bdf93720f78dd5a588d7afa
Signed-off-by: Yanbo Zhou <yanbo.zhou@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/393130
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dariusz Stojaczyk <dariuszx.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
This makes a number of things much simpler and eliminates
the need for upcoming proposed reset handling.
Change-Id: I23a6badd0873f6dcf38ba1e55bf18d846c2843df
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/407357
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
It doesn't represent an io_channel, so lets
rename it to something less confusing.
Change-Id: I730eb0ff0eb7737a59c190812a25b327ccd8fc14
Suggested-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dariusz Stojaczyk <dariuszx.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/409998
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
Bdev layer has been recently refactored to share
internal module channels for *all* bdevs of the
same bdev module. This makes us return ENOMEM for I/O
of one bdev if another bdev of the same module (nvme, split, etc)
is entirely saturated. This is not the behavior we want,
as these bdevs may not have anything in common.
This `issue` has been fixed just now, but to prevent
it coming back again lets add a unit test for it.
This test case creates two bdevs using two separate
io_devices and checks if ENOMEM handling is somehow common
for these two. It must not be.
Change-Id: Ic32ef4b4347b8856d4b9f91107e6f188ad67978e
Suggested-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dariusz Stojaczyk <dariuszx.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/409997
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Future changes will rely on the ability to atomically
swap this data structure out.
Change-Id: I77b93252df63155692271b5665cc040cb83a33d0
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/409224
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
These won't cover race conditions across threads, but
at least we have something to test the behavior.
Change-Id: I8e620d2076fe7a3d95df668fda4bee49b6d0afa7
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/409343
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
The QoS parameters are only used from the QoS thread,
so gather them together in a struct pointed to by the
bdev.
Change-Id: I91005f1d00205217a189d1ebacdb55782814f247
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/407356
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I07dac4bbf06a85659ae5d31e3f8d037d87825694
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Kulasek <tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/408483
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
