Fix SC2064 issue.
Use single quotes, otherwise trap expands now rather than
when signalled.
Change-Id: I0b3a9157f52eed037e8d217f639c64d6876ec1e1
Signed-off-by: Karol Latecki <karol.latecki@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/464655
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pawel Kaminski <pawelx.kaminski@intel.com>
Changing according to styling check done by ShellCheck.
Removing from check_format.sh exclusion list:
SC2236 - Use -n instead of ! -z
SC2070 - -n doesn't work with unquoted arguments. Quote or use [[ ]]
Change-Id: Ia9d645b9d0ce31b67c4de682395cf36f4ddc8d1f
Signed-off-by: Karol Latecki <karol.latecki@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/463180
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
It's always set in autotest_common.sh, there's no need
to set it again in each test script.
Change-Id: Ib14c4189c553dad54a3065c1a1d413a5fc5a5347
Signed-off-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/457466
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
We use python3 now, not python. This is important
because in next patch we will use a new 'aliases'
keyword argument in the argparse API that's only
available in Python 3.
While here, clean up some documentation that was
instructing users to call python explicitly instead
of just invoking scripts/rpc.py directly.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I0c11e131cd56f7c994aa8fe21b4b00ae33489fdd
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/453460
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pawel Kaminski <pawelx.kaminski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
