per Intel policy to include file commit date using git cmd
below. The policy does not apply to non-Intel (C) notices.
git log --follow -C90% --format=%ad --date default <file> | tail -1
and then pull just the year from the result.
Intel copyrights were not added to files where Intel either had
no contribution ot the contribution lacked substance (ie license
header updates, formatting changes, etc)
For intel copyrights added, --follow and -C95% were used.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: I2ef86976095b88a9bf5b1003e59f3943cd6bbe4c
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/15209
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Karas <krzysztof.karas@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
The test verifies that bdev-based QoS settings are correctly applied on
NVMe/TCP devices. Other device types supporting bdev-based QoS will
share most of the code, so NVMe/TCP is a good test vehicle, as it's the
easiest one to set up.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Sztyber <konrad.sztyber@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ic715483e888a7219fd27367d527201d75e8b69a2
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/14270
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
The test uses bdev_crypto and NVMe/TCP devices to verify that volumes
with crypto parameters are correctly attached and any errors are handled
as intended.
It starts up two spdk_tgt processes, one is being orchestrated by SMA
and the other one acts as an NVMe-oF target. This ensures that we can
verify that SMA terminates discovery service connections whenever a
failure occurs during crypto setup.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Sztyber <konrad.sztyber@intel.com>
Change-Id: I74001c256d4a05d2d8d295fb6fd8375d30ab66a1
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/13873
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
The test uses exisitng SPDK tests workflow for performing
series of tests for vfiouser subsystem on live QEMU instances.
For testing purposes it sends series of gRPC methods calls
that are serviced by the SMA and subsystems and then uses
the regular SPDK RPC interface to verify its effects on the application.
SSH connection to VM is used to verify that changes took place.
Signed-off-by: Milosz Linkiewicz <milosz.linkiewicz@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Brzezinka <sebastian.brzezinka@intel.com>
Change-Id: I38258c1a3f9ee3e457ef0426cdc6feff2f38d729
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/11999
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Sztyber <konrad.sztyber@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Karol Latecki <karol.latecki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
The test uses `scripts/sma-client.py` to send a series of gRPC methods
that are serviced by the SMA then verify that new vhost device are
available on qemu guest os.
Change-Id: Ic4a1d56da59a636556fd6dfd4787fc613a4eb325
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Brzezinka <sebastian.brzezinka@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/12412
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Sztyber <konrad.sztyber@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
The test checks that it's possible to attach remote volumes through
discovery service. The tests starts up three SPDK instances: one is being
managed by SMA, while the other two are acting as remote storage nodes.
The test verifies that volumes can be successfully discvered and
attached to a device and that the connections to the discovery
subsystems are refcounted correctly.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Sztyber <konrad.sztyber@intel.com>
Change-Id: I3488b822880b99ef9cfd70e03de3ed9054c13901
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/12414
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
The test verifies that it's possible to register device managers from
out-of-tree plugins. The test defines two plugins, each defining two
device managers implementing the same two protocols and verifies that
it's possible to register different combinations.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Sztyber <konrad.sztyber@intel.com>
Change-Id: I2144b40db603fea95bf8b571777e6662b4de9bc7
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/11729
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
The test uses `scripts/sma-client.py` to send a series of gRPC methods
that are serviced by the SMA and then uses the regular SPDK RPC
interface to verify its effects on the application.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Sztyber <konrad.sztyber@intel.com>
Change-Id: I2b61c61cb475ec906bb6a594cda3082c0bd8ab44
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/11728
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
