per Intel policy to include file commit date using git cmd
below. The policy does not apply to non-Intel (C) notices.
git log --follow -C90% --format=%ad --date default <file> | tail -1
and then pull just the year from the result.
Intel copyrights were not added to files where Intel either had
no contribution ot the contribution lacked substance (ie license
header updates, formatting changes, etc)
For intel copyrights added, --follow and -C95% were used.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: I2ef86976095b88a9bf5b1003e59f3943cd6bbe4c
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/15209
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Karas <krzysztof.karas@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
bdevperf application is utilized in multiple test scenarios
and most prominently in SPDK performance reports.
Similar to perf and fio_plugins, it is used to measure performance.
It is intended to represent the expected behavior of users
application that use SPDK bdev layer.
Applications under --enable-tests are intended for specific test
scenarios and user interaction is usually via a test scripts.
Meanwhile --enable-examples are used more broadly to teach and
show usage of SPDK libraries.
As an added benefit with this patch, its possible to compile
bdevperf without need to satisfy additional requirements to
compile all the test applications.
Change-Id: I9aaec1f9d729a1cdee89b5fdc365d61c19b03f82
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Karas <krzysztof.karas@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/14558
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
zram doesn't support some of the uring-specific setup that xnvme may
be using, in particular the IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL, so switch to something
more common like null_blk module. For details see:
https://github.com/spdk/spdk/issues/2708
Signed-off-by: Michal Berger <michal.berger@intel.com>
Change-Id: I48b91ba356b4054433eb1835fa3e2708c8d2628c
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/14920
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pawel Piatek <pawelx.piatek@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kamil Godzwon <kamilx.godzwon@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Karol Latecki <karol.latecki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
This test is meant to simply verify basic IO and rpc integrity with
regards to different io_mechanisms.
Signed-off-by: Michal Berger <michal.berger@intel.com>
Change-Id: I936d57c6ac539e77761656a1ec2b8ad1013f918f
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/14119
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dong Yi <dongx.yi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Sztyber <konrad.sztyber@intel.com>
