per Intel policy to include file commit date using git cmd
below. The policy does not apply to non-Intel (C) notices.
git log --follow -C90% --format=%ad --date default <file> | tail -1
and then pull just the 4 digit year from the result.
Intel copyrights were not added to files where Intel either had
no contribution ot the contribution lacked substance (ie license
header updates, formatting changes, etc). Contribution date used
"--follow -C95%" to get the most accurate date.
Note that several files in this patch didn't end the license/(c)
block with a blank comment line so these were added as the vast
majority of files do have this last blank line. Simply there for
consistency.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: Id5b7ce4f658fe87132f14139ead58d6e285c04d4
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/15192
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Many open source projects have moved to using SPDX identifiers
to specify license information, reducing the amount of
boilerplate code in every source file. This patch replaces
the bulk of SPDK .c, .cpp and Makefiles with the BSD-3-Clause
identifier.
Almost all of these files share the exact same license text,
and this patch only modifies the files that contain the
most common license text. There can be slight variations
because the third clause contains company names - most say
"Intel Corporation", but there are instances for Nvidia,
Samsung, Eideticom and even "the copyright holder".
Used a bash script to automate replacement of the license text
with SPDX identifier which is checked into scripts/spdx.sh.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: Iaa88ab5e92ea471691dc298cfe41ebfb5d169780
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/12904
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dong Yi <dongx.yi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Sztyber <konrad.sztyber@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: <qun.wan@intel.com>
This test reproduced issue #2428. It does the following:
1) submit some large writes (requiring R2T or RDMA READ)
2) submit fused compare (first fused)
3) variable number of qpair polls
4) submit fused write (second fused)
The RDMA and TCP transports were not accounting for the
fused bits, and would send a non-fused command down to
the target layer between the two fused commands.
By adding the variable amount of delay between the fused
command submissions, it creates a window where a large
write's payload is fetched from the host and submitted
to the target between submission of the two fused commands.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I1abd5a6bca08386279c09f8135387826149d30ef
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/11963
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
