There are a few places we can replace existing license
text with SPDX license identifiers, that did not match
the auto-replacement script in the previous patch.
Make those replacements manually in this patch instead.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I258720c03bc2153d1c56a8adf6357f224b911c0b
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/12913
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dong Yi <dongx.yi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Sztyber <konrad.sztyber@intel.com>
The script can now match UUIDs via the $(UUID) marker.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Sztyber <konrad.sztyber@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ied11f9ce65e4f1102309523f3f8ec0ee7c9e74d0
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/11410
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Match script before this change ignored all input
when passing just a new line in ignore file.
This was because \n symbol was stripped from that
particular line (chop()) leaving empty string.
This always matched all of the input when using index().
Now when comparing the input line and ignore line,
we check that ignore line is not empty.
Besides that, to still allow ignoring new lines
we check and compare both strings directly.
Changed chop() to chomp() to prevent further breakage,
difference is that chomp() only strips new line characters.
As that was the original intention anyway.
The loop changed so we exit on first instance of ignored
line matching, rather than mention particular line
multiple times for each matched ignore.
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
Change-Id: I62d48e1130c600ffff6713d2748239cc955bbe9e
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/483834
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Will follow this up with a doc change but want to make sure we're
all good with it first. This is meant to not only beef up
blobstore testing but provide the 'match' utilitiy for all test
cases where we are currently calling an executable and either
counting only on a return code to determine success or failure
or worse yet we're just running it and if it doesn't explode we
assume its a pass.
The 'match' util was borrowed from the PMDK folks after first
adding the "ignore" feature upstream to make it easier to use
in SPDK. It works like this:
When the developer checks in a test they create and check in
the output of the test with two different file extensions:
.ignore: should include a string per line for output lines
that we want to totally ignore typically because they're
platform specific so the output could be different from
machine to machine. In this case I'm ignoring all output
lines with 'DPDK' or 'EAL' or '...' in them. The first
few are obvious, the last is because the test tool will
print a varrying number of these as progress indicators.
.match: this is a copy of the output that the developer
'fixes' up by replacing platform specific output strings
with replacable tokens as described in the 'match' help.
This is where you'd want to match an entire line minus
something like a CPU count or free block count or
something. The 'ignore' feature was added simply so we
wouldn't have to edit every single line of an output
file that had DPDK or EAL in it.
Then you modify the test script to save the output and
smply run the match util providing the name of the
match file and if it fails to match the actual output
with the saved output that's been token'ized the script
will error.
The obvious advantage here is that now we can confirm all
of the output from a test executable is as we expect.
Change-Id: I701d36ee83d37b6193e16ed3171e114f814e5eb3
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/397027
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
