per Intel policy to include file commit date using git cmd
below. The policy does not apply to non-Intel (C) notices.
git log --follow -C90% --format=%ad --date default <file> | tail -1
and then pull just the 4 digit year from the result.
Intel copyrights were not added to files where Intel either had
no contribution ot the contribution lacked substance (ie license
header updates, formatting changes, etc). Contribution date used
"--follow -C95%" to get the most accurate date.
Note that several files in this patch didn't end the license/(c)
block with a blank comment line so these were added as the vast
majority of files do have this last blank line. Simply there for
consistency.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: Id5b7ce4f658fe87132f14139ead58d6e285c04d4
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/15192
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Many open source projects have moved to using SPDX identifiers
to specify license information, reducing the amount of
boilerplate code in every source file. This patch replaces
the bulk of SPDK .c, .cpp and Makefiles with the BSD-3-Clause
identifier.
Almost all of these files share the exact same license text,
and this patch only modifies the files that contain the
most common license text. There can be slight variations
because the third clause contains company names - most say
"Intel Corporation", but there are instances for Nvidia,
Samsung, Eideticom and even "the copyright holder".
Used a bash script to automate replacement of the license text
with SPDX identifier which is checked into scripts/spdx.sh.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: Iaa88ab5e92ea471691dc298cfe41ebfb5d169780
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/12904
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dong Yi <dongx.yi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Sztyber <konrad.sztyber@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: <qun.wan@intel.com>
Replace spdk_bdev_get_by_name() + spdk_bdev_unregister() by
spdk_bdev_unregister_by_name() wherever possible.
This simplifies the code and makes the code more reliable.
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <smatsumoto@nvidia.com>
Change-Id: I91388c9d0b2e244cb745720a480803b03c42a226
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/12066
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
For deletion RPCs, a boolean false response had been sent rather than
a error response when they failed. However, boolean false resonse had
caused false negative, that is, test code had regarded as success by
mistake. For example, the following test code regards as success if
JSON RPC returns a boolean false response.
if $rpc_py bdev_pmem_delete $pmem_bdev_name; then
error "bdev_pmem_delete deleted pmem bdev for second time!"
fi
This patch fixes such false negative issue by explicitly returning a
error response if deletion RPCs fail.
Only the bdev_virtio_detach_controller RPC has implemented this.
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <smatsumoto@nvidia.com>
Change-Id: I5409a070cbd2364dbb63b42421b032534c6f9a0b
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/12077
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: John Kariuki <John.K.Kariuki@intel.com>
There are many duplicated codes about sending response for writing bool result.
That we need a function to do this.
Then we can reduce many codes.
Signed-off-by: yidong0635 <dongx.yi@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ic439111b1e9ca1013f8c657ab925f0c27a7be699
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/5033
Community-CI: Broadcom CI
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
There is nothing left here, so remove it.
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ib947d42bc577dbebb4650b1be885e05a80f8f8cf
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/4541
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anil Veerabhadrappa <anil.veerabhadrappa@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@mellanox.com>
Community-CI: Broadcom CI
The block size of non-disk files can't be automatically detected,
so add an argument to specify it.
Signed-off-by: Yao Liu <yotta.liu@ucloud.cn>
Change-Id: Ia11ab177b78c66ede4a09a997bba28827d83ec25
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/473607
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Community-CI: Broadcom SPDK FC-NVMe CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
