Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jim Harris
7e846d2bb9 test/bdev: add resource counting to bdev mt unit tests
This is in preparation for ENOMEM handling in the SPDK
bdev layer.

Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I6f5cdc63e4c1c903faa64c3eb61ea4aee0290ec1

Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/380512
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
2017-09-28 13:36:23 -04:00
Jim Harris
b4ffeaec7a bdev: fail IO submitted while reset in progress
This patch introduces per-channel flags to keep state of information
needed in the primary I/O path.  Setting/clearing of these flags
should only done through an spdk_for_each_channel() call.  Currently
there is only a RESET_IN_PROGRESS flag defined but more may be added
in the future.

Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ia81817e2dabc9997c12beebae72fb129cb5dcf9a

Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/377828
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dariusz Stojaczyk <dariuszx.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
2017-09-25 13:56:29 -04:00
Jim Harris
1f935c7a9b bdev: properly handle aborted resets
Previously, we naively assumed that a completed
reset was the reset in progress, and would
unilaterally set reset_in_progres to false.

So change reset_in_progress to a bdev_io pointer
instead.  If this is not NULL, a reset is not in
progress.  Then when a reset completes, we only
set the reset_in_progress pointer to NULL if we
are completing the reset that is in progress.

We also were not aborting queued resets when
destroying a channel so that is fixed here too.

The added unit test covers both fixes above - it will
submit two resets on a different channels, then destroy
the second channel.  This will abort the second reset
and check that the bdev still sees the first reset as in
progress.

Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I61df677cfa272c589ca03cb81753f71b0807a182

Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/378199
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dariusz Stojaczyk <dariuszx.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
2017-09-22 15:38:44 -04:00
Jim Harris
ab29d2ce5d bdev: improve handling of channel deletion with queued resets
Upper layers are not supposed to put an I/O channel if there
are still I/O outstanding.  This should apply to resets as well.

To better detect this case, do not remove the reset from
the channel's queued_reset list until it is ready to be
submitted to the bdev module.  This ensures:

1) We can detect if a channel is put with a reset outstanding.
2) We do not access freed memory, when the channel is destroyed
   before the reset message can submit the reset I/O.
3) Abort the queued reset if a channel is destroyed.

Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I0c03eee8b3642155c19c2996e25955baac22d406

Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/378198
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dariusz Stojaczyk <dariuszx.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
2017-09-22 15:38:44 -04:00
Jim Harris
674c709733 test/bdev: add simulated multi-thread unit tests
Use the mock wrappers to override pthread_self(), enabling
the unit tests to switch emulation between different threads
from the context of a single unit test threads.

These tests don't do anything useful yet, but will get
fleshed out more as part of some upcoming changes that
will require some more rigorous testing for multi-thread
scenarios (such as multiple channels).

Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: Iffdd2c6bebc45da52927769d374c43c5eea0aa12

Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/377970
Reviewed-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dariusz Stojaczyk <dariuszx.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
2017-09-22 15:38:44 -04:00