Add to both accel framework and add sw engine implementation.
IDXD implementation and accel example app patches to follow.
Dual-cast copies the same source to two separate destination buffers.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: I7df28518505f0d4bbb32cc8e69eb8a231fb29452
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/2127
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Community-CI: Broadcom CI
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
This is an important aspect of ABI versioning.
There was a change to the spdk_bdev_opts struct
which is accessible from the public API that results
in an ABI change.
There was also a change in the spdk_accel_module_if struct that
will affect new modules so its major version needs to be revved.
There was also a change in the publically accessible rmda_hooks
structure which forced an ABI change in the NVMe library.
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Change-Id: I5cc6886fe01b4adc2836b6e15995471f0361dc29
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/2663
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
Also, while we are here, consolidate setting SO_SUFFIX to one spot.
Previously, it was possible for a library to slip through
without an SO version.
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Change-Id: I4db5fa5839502d266c6259892e5719b05134518c
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/2361
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Community-CI: Broadcom CI
Reviewed-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
Along with the sw engine back end implementation for it. IDXD
back end will follow, the use in the accel perf tool as part
of verify.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ia1013cd884ff71990f898320d6a22e96e16ad2a4
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/2107
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Community-CI: Broadcom CI
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Add the CRC function at the framework level and implement the
software engine back end to use ISAL. The patch series will continue
to include an option for accel_perf to test CRC as well as IDXD
implementation.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: I4eff3bbcf98c0bc2928a48272a57031c8b96394e
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/2072
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Community-CI: Broadcom CI
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@mellanox.com>
This was added before the usage of having a SW engine and 2 HW
engines was fully thought out. The current rules are:
* if no HW engine specific enable RPC is sent, use SW
* if a HW engine specific enable RPC is sent, use it
* If a 2nd HW engine specific enable RPC is sent, ignore
In this scheme there's no need for an RPC that lets the user
choose which engine to use because they already do so when
they enable an engine.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: I006ffb3b417f1e93bb061b29535d157ba66f03b4
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/2033
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
This patch also implements the new API for the 3 existing engines.
There was also some minor clean in one file, moving a function to
eliminate multiple forward declarations (there would have been
another one with this new API).
The next patch will use this API in the accel perf tool.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: I4ebc9cb3d1c588919235b5080cbeec29189efa21
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/2025
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Community-CI: Broadcom CI
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
This will allow us to keep track of compatibility issues on a
per-library basis.
Change-Id: Ib0c796adb1efe1570212a503ed660bef6f142b6e
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/1067
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Startup RPC only to avoid issues trying to switch while in use.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: I7f1801905de0927f3610c4065182dd8fa88cdfdd
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/660
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
The copy engine library, modules and public APIs have been renamed.
Use of the word `copy` has been replaced with the word `accel`
short for accelerator in preparation for adding new capabilities
in the future. Additionally, APIs for what was previously called
the `memcpy` engine have been renamed to identify the engine as a
software accelerator.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ia607aa718416146fbba1e6792b8de0f66bd8a5de
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/576
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
