A new public flag, SPDK_IDXD_FLAG_NONTEMPORAL, is introduced
that hints to DSA that it should bypass CPU cache. An example
use case of this would be where the target is PMEM. This flag
is not set by the low level library (so default is that CPU
cache is the target).
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: I99fc62d6bfd6ec97985a86fc1ae5454a21679684
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/11482
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Reviewed-by: GangCao <gang.cao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Previously required flags were hardcoded in the low level library.
By having the user pass them in there is more flexbility and control.
This was driven by the need to add a new flag for pmem durability,
coming in a future patch in this series.
There is no change in functionality with this patch, just movement
of where flags are set and by whom and the plumbing of 'flags'..
Also note that some flags in scenarios that we know are required are
still set by the library.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: I194278f9e3cec0886628585cf84bcc2eae635e0a
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/9449
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Reviewed-by: GangCao <gang.cao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Although there are no use cases right now where a batch can have
mixed op types, there may be in the future and rather than have
one blow up because ops have different reserved fields and its
not valid to submit an op with a non-zero reserved field, go
ahead and zero these out like we do with descriptors in the non
batch case.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: I6d1bb416dc84aa1f76407c76aedf0768dd003218
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/11325
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
We always set num_batches to the same value we set num_descriptors
so just make it explicit. Makes it easier to experiment with
different values when performance testing.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: I648262001772c791a032d6cab38dc3b03c1d55c1
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/11354
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
The new batching code needs to call the cb_fn for each of the
elements of the batch when a batch that hasn't been submitted
yet needs to be cancelled (due to an error in building it).
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: I6f94b27dd7c64f756193ec3532de98b644b41d7e
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/11212
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
In several functions. Busy handling also maans paying attention
to the rc when submitting a batch and not clearing chan->batch
unless the call was a success.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ic45b10ade2ebdcd845dc33e54dd9c93068ceb98c
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/11221
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
To avoid re-use of descriptors that may have fields set that are
reserved by the one being used now. For example:
If a batch desc is being built and was previously used by a copy
we need to clear out the dst_addr field or things will explode
as this is a reserved field for a batch.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: I6ba50b76589e38a276683291f5ec2970c80e8aa8
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/11308
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
to a single command
Change-Id: Ic0ca65b7399f3cbc4153327d83de7db69de48709
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/11209
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Convert the batch to the single command inside of it.
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ia117175ef3f4a8290d313e0bdc794f6a3276e042
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/11166
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Transparently group independent operations into idxd batch operations
between polls. This increases the effective queue depth.
Change-Id: Ic09b21ed29aaefe2eccef9a6ae0e1b05990ef631
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/10998
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
This is no longer needed.
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Change-Id: I11b7e9acbcf1239a0ad2f49169d7e3d5844a1b93
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/11029
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Nightly build failing on Centos 7 machine
C compiler for the host machine: cc (gcc 4.8.5 "cc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44)")
C linker for the host machine: cc ld.bfd 2.27-44
Host machine cpu family: x86_64
Host machine cpu: x86_64
Errors like:
idxd.c: In function ‘spdk_idxd_submit_crc32c’:
idxd.c:902:24: error: ‘prev_crc’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
desc->crc32c.addr = (uint64_t)prev_crc;
Signed-off-by: Pawel Piatek <pawelx.piatek@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ib40160b1974ecd3f1579566b6eb5d88e03b5bb2b
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/11082
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Sztyber <konrad.sztyber@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
We can do all of the configuration in spdk_idxd_get_channel, and the
configuration step was always done immediately after getting the channel
anyway.
Change-Id: I9fef342e393261f0db6308cd5be4f49720420aa0
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/10349
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Monica Kenguva <monica.kenguva@intel.com>
The driver still may use batches to implement some operations or for
efficiency reasons.
Batching my be resurrected in the future, but for now we need to do some
fairly extensive performance changes on the driver and eliminating all
of this unused/inactive code makes that much easier.
Change-Id: I92fcec9e4c7424771f053123d821cc57dba9793c
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/10348
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
These will be used internally by some of the other code paths.
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Change-Id: Idc3c024cf1bf3d468f87176373ef97bf064ced8f
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/11033
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
The batching API will be removed from idxd shortly.
Change-Id: I04cf61112f7831a9fb0fefc269706495761d0889
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/11032
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
dynamically
This can be done once on allocation rather than every time the batch is
submitted.
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Change-Id: I8092f65f1b864cc3cc78db9fdee085d8bb0471df
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/10293
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
This only needs to be updated on the last step of the CRC calculation.
Change-Id: I0b41f33bfbbc195a857d1c39d9f8f7164d2bba8d
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/10292
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
This uses a batch with the fence flag for now. There are several other
implementation options that will be explored in the future.
Change-Id: I4f344d671400508de05f80b026d42f775c5b9588
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/10289
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Compare two scattered memory regions
Change-Id: I6ce5c9e7bc1ee1ef0e9173c00e86628d43a1e41f
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/10287
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
No code changes. Move these up so they can be used by some of the
regular command submit paths in future patches.
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ib8e54d47f7df35771b6c89d7c49d5182cae79e47
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/10285
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: John Kariuki <John.K.Kariuki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
We allocate from the head, so it's better to free to
the head too for better cache utilization.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I5c32244f446bd7a1df12eefc81245b3ef7e24070
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/10193
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Reviewed-by: John Kariuki <John.K.Kariuki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
This limitation doesn't really take effect currently,
since the typical number of slots per channel isn't
bigger than MAX_COMPLETIONS_PER_POLL. But there's
no reason for this limit anymore - we should always
poll as many completions as we find.
It's better to remove this now, in case we have
configs in the future with higher number of slots
per channel.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I5d90d41e5142622b79d9765fbc62da1516e2b8be
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/10189
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: John Kariuki <John.K.Kariuki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Monica Kenguva <monica.kenguva@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
Prior a regular round robin could result in strange performance
if an idxd device from another socket was used.
Signed-off-by: peluse <peluse@localhost.localdomain>
Signed-off-by: Ziye Yang <ziye.yang@intel.com>
Change-Id: Id863c79067beabe73ef89d92b3fb3c436821b97a
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/9367
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Monica Kenguva <monica.kenguva@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
The issue is that:
We call cb_fn firstly, then add the related idxd_ops into the
chan->ops_list. Then if in user's callback, we call spdk_idxd_submit_*
function gain, then we will allocate new idxd_opts first. So if there is
recursive spdk_idxd_submit_* in the call back function, then
we will exhaust all the ops_pool resources. And the function will
report -EBUSY issue in _idxd_prep_command function.
And this patch fixes this issue by adding back idxd_ops before calling
user's call_cb function.
Change-Id: I32239fb29be875bc452803a48dc24ff5fa533016
Signed-off-by: Ziye Yang <ziye.yang@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/9401
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Add more information to users which implementation cannot
be set for idxd.
Signed-off-by: Ziye Yang <ziye.yang@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ib26f117dc19fa1f28cc1d548549caba0b696a915
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/9399
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Reviewed-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Small but noticable on perf top. We were using a list to track
valid batches and checking it on every submission. Instead just
put a valid channel ptr in the batch struct and clear it when the
batch is freed. There was no other reason for the list.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ia26ceee578be4a82f4fd8abb2358ff18c56271a4
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/9149
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Was set at a pretty high number during early development.
Instead of a #define, lets use the same math we use to
determine the size of the operation and descriptor pools as
that's the max number of batches that will be needed.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ide5311b4b6c931010413d0f82baed0e05d5fcde7
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/9099
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
When address translation failed we were not putting the op back
into the pool. In one place also changed the return error from
translation from hardcoded value to the rc returned by the call
to be consistent with the rest of the code.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: I6d0c9c0f469a213721c6a5ce37c4e9dbdcef8183
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/9097
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@mellanox.com>
These are fixed, no reason to tranlate them with every IO. This
patch is just for non-batched IO. Batched IO will come later.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ifb7bdf147658a23714d94bb7f88d7fedd1749153
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/9073
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
In prep for upcoming patch
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: Iebc5bf5f6715c85cc09b404128338cd6f08c421e
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/9072
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
We can instead use a combination of the op code and the batch
element in the op structure to determine if the op that is
completing is part of a batch or not so we know whether to
return it to the free list or not.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: I8e27c7b991f5a20e82394a25a52ece560cab5543
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/9071
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@mellanox.com>
Tested-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
No real material impact but easier to read and cleans up error
handling when submitting a batch. Before we put the operation on
the list of operations to poll when it was prepared, a few LOC
before it was submitted to HW. Now we do it in the hw submission
function. For batch elements, they are added just before the
batch operation itself (as was before).
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: Icfeaeeb650d5b63f81e13a8ffd27e349c7118089
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/9069
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
The bit arrays were used for dynamic flow control in a previous
implementation. They are no longer needed as flow control is
now static and managed solely in the idxd plug in module. Use
simple lists of descriptors and completion records instead.
This is a simpler implementation and will allow for some future
clean up of structures as well.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: I8c4cce12e88ac5416e3fe29a416487759214ec9f
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/8922
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ziye Yang <ziye.yang@intel.com>
If there is hardware issues, we do not need to assign
the result. Because we will report the error status to the uplayer.
Change-Id: I647ddd609a1d5d0d52cc4fee59699b9992da4fa4
Signed-off-by: Ziye Yang <ziye.yang@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/8864
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Karas <krzysztof.karas@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@mellanox.com>
Those functions are exported publicly, so better to
add some assert functions to detect some null pointer
errors.
We do not use if/else check, because it is too heavy.
Signed-off-by: Ziye Yang <ziye.yang@intel.com>
Change-Id: I16814efb84a5a41876657f0caf5f0a6d0c2db8f3
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/8863
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
This assert is used to make sure that there is no
active batch (spdk_accel_batch) task is used.
If there are active batches found, it means that
we did not handle this case in a good manner.
Signed-off-by: Ziye Yang <ziye.yang@intel.com>
Change-Id: I7ea6247d2d5a40cf4f3f31cd8b1240fed4648d62
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/8857
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: <dongx.yi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Karas <krzysztof.karas@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@mellanox.com>
This batch_op field is not necessary because we can
use the comp_ctx->desc->opcode to judge whether it is related
a batched task or not.
Change-Id: Id329221ccf272c4c3bb8c1b5ec08433029a9a1f8
Signed-off-by: Ziye Yang <ziye.yang@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/8865
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Previously we used a counter of our own to make sure all batch
elements plus the batch itself were done before we freed the batch.
This was due to some observations early on that the batch desc
could complete before the individual elements and a lack of clarity
as to whether this was due to the simulator or the fact that
we poll on completions and could therefore "see" completions in
a different order at that time (we were using bit arrays to poll).
Now we use an ordered (in time) list to poll locations so if we
instead put the elements on the list first and then the batch desc
itself we are assured to always "see" them in order provided the
underlying device meets spec which there's no reason to assume it
does not.
This simplifies things a bit at the same time and still assures
that we call list calbacks in order and then the batch callback
without "special" handling.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: I4d9e3997786f2116ce6515682b8117799c645f51
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/8397
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Left over from when the field was a void *
Signed-off-by: paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: If9dfe2878f6afd6137d6d8efec90e310baf417f1
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/8280
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ziye Yang <ziye.yang@intel.com>
Allows for better performance by not hitting the same portal
address with every submission.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ziye Yang <ziye.yang@intel.com>
Change-Id: I1ec8eae6f3acec9e98161029cd5406ec08603aa6
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/8190
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot