This is the callback type used for message passing. The
old name is easy to confuse with the callback to pass
a message to a thread or the upcoming callback to
spawn a thread.
Change-Id: I5fd63b57c4be2a4262a197850e6de4901be03ee7
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/435941
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
spdk.unittest.mk includes spdk.app.mk, but some unit test
Makefiles include both spdk.unittest.mk and spdk.app.mk,
meaning spdk.app.mk gets included twice. Fix that.
This hasn't been an issue because spdk.app.mk currently
only includes variables - but no rules.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I23d39e8084f79442fb06ae9b5a6a68d6134adff4
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/434281
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
This will make future changes to the threading model
easier.
Change-Id: I4abfe0850648a0f7449804066d4a02823393e4a6
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/433680
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
This will make the conversion to the new threading library
easier later on.
Change-Id: Ie7358e89128f28080a986e12cd014de7df4752e4
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/433679
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Change-Id: I6babd4cf990bf19b510db88bdfb0ca81e29d9252
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/414700
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Madhu Pai <mpai@netapp.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
This file is accessed by files in multiple directories under test.
Change-Id: I634481fb58eab5c097aaece5289f88e531954fcb
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/404976
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
All files called directly by the unittest.sh script are now located in
the test/unit directory.
Change-Id: I95cfb3d5b7c6ede59d7183c39466f32b7e676643
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/401717
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I06d33ff7f6df0724768f5a23236485c26e0568f4
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/399729
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
From the exising code, the comparison should + 1.
Suppose offset = 2^19, we still can be fit into
tree with level =0, since there will be 64 buffer,
each with size 2^18, so we do not need to
increse the tree level.
Also a unit test is added to demonstrate this.
Change-Id: I95d3542b0881aa7bb661bc57bc789cc4ef4e7509
Signed-off-by: Ziye Yang <optimistyzy@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/372396
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
