Checking if required parameters strip_size, num_base_bdevs, and
raid_level had been done in raid_bdev_config_add(). However, this
required us to use integer type.
If we do the check in raid_bdev_parse_raid(), we will be able to
use the same type between function parameters and variables of
struct, and hence do in this patch.
This will align with the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Change-Id: I10fd75f25ed9a5d40eb189b05c2a20c276fa3ad6
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/464365
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: yidong0635 <dongx.yi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
The following issue was observed.
The first thread returned the last IO channel and the second thread
then removed the first base device, but raid_bdev_cleanup() was
called before raid_bdev_destroy_cb() was called.
raid_bdev_destroy_cb() was accessed to the raid bdev already freed
by raid_bdev_cleanup() and caused segmentation fault.
The call sequence was as follows:
The first thread:
spdk_put_io_channel() -> ch->destroy_cb -> raid_bdev_destroy_cb
-> access raid bdev
The second thread:
raid_bdev_remove_base_devices() -> raid_bdev_deconfigure() ->
spdk_bdev_unregister() -> spdk_io_device_unregister() ->
spdk_bdev_destroy_cb() -> raid_bdev_destruct() -> raid_bdev_cleanup()
-> free raid bdev
The fix is to hold number of created channels in struct
raid_bdev_io_channel and use it in raid_bdev_destroy_cb().
Bdev layer, IO device/channel layer, and NVMe-oF layer already
process this case correctly.
Fixes#884.
Reported-by: yidong0635 <dongx.yi@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ie9d61bdddca479ce7f491ff9a08db45e71f16a8d
Signed-off-by: yidong0635 <dongx.yi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/463249
Reviewed-by: Broadcom SPDK FC-NVMe CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
We have to process only the first call of destroy_raid_bdev RPC
for the same RAID bdev.
The existing flag destruct_called cannot be used for that purpose
because of the following reason.
destruct_called is set to true in both of
- destroy_raid_bdev RPC
- hot removal of any base bdev.
If destruct_called is set in destroy_raid_bdev RPC, destroy_raid_bdev
RPC must return immediately, but if destruct_called is set in hot
removal of any base bdev, destroy_raid_bdev RPC must go forward
with the current logic.
Hence add another flag destroy_started to struct raid_bdev and
use it.
Change-Id: Ifeefcaa1d289499342d8bb9bc162ded65e0368dd
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/450885
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
The product_name for raid bdevs was "Pooled Device" which was a legacy
naming convention that hadn't been cleaned up yet. This changes the
naming to be up to date with the current naming scheme.
Signed-off-by: Mike Carlin <mikefcarlin@protonmail.com>
Change-Id: I9092a2b793e48bb9ec0349087a31fdcde17ed9cd
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/452269
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
This is a preparation to add completion callback to the
destroy_raid_bdev RPC.
Newly added callback parameters are passed to spdk_bdev_unregister()
in the end. This patch adds just parameters and the next patch will
utilize them.
Change-Id: Ic239c55872c0c69f3d1625eaccdb91a32a9d4d30
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/450572
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
This is a preparation to add completion callback to the
destroy_raid_bdev RPC.
This patch doesn't change any behavior. This patch just factors out
code into a function and move it to raid_bdev.c.
Change-Id: Ia86741ec686ffd85e4d826caf4442292963922ec
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/450567
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
raid_bdev_free_base_bdev_resource() has been referenced only in
bdev_raid.c.
Change-Id: I4be9ed5b7a93b950b16e57323cdf1f4bdf89841f
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/450565
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
raid_bdev_cleanup() has been used only in raid_bdev.c.
Change-Id: I4dcc4979eda2fd872fda23e3433b120ab6aaaad2
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/450564
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Configuration lists in RAID bdev are unlikely to be exposed outside
of the RAID bdev module. Hence simply the prefix g_ will be enough
to clarify they are global data structure in RAID bdev module.
Change-Id: I9df88db8fa651d5af7d771d88ff04bb5997079c9
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/450563
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
base_bdev_io_expected can be used for the situation
that IO requries multiple and uncertain number of
base bdevs.
Change-Id: I912400f839c02c95606bc94e7c8ad4946e90b6bf
Signed-off-by: Xiaodong Liu <xiaodong.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/446009
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
The elements and functions which are used for raid reset io,
can also be used for other potential raid IO requests which
need multiple base_bdev involved.
Change-Id: Ide7ea190fdbd29da9f9fa22862a0a7c162509697
Signed-off-by: Xiaodong Liu <xiaodong.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/441308
Reviewed-by: wuzhouhui <wuzhouhui@kingsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
strip_size as an rpc param is now deprecated and can be removed
in a future release. Either strip_size or strip_size_kb can be
used but only one of them or the rpc will fail.
Internally we maintain both fields because strip size always
comes in as KB but we convert it to blocks so having both elements
makes it clear for developers what they're looking at.
JSON output includes both strip_size and strip_size_kb.
Fixes#550
Change-Id: I5dc51e8af22eae3d56af8f8d37a564dbaae228fa
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/437873
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Previously, the difference between configuring and offline is
unclear, this patch just fixes it. The key difference should be
whether the raid bdev have ever registered. Offline is registered
before but unregistered now, and configuring has never registered.
According to the above, we should never set configuring raid bdev to
offline because it never got registered.
Change-Id: Id44ef6654e032993ffb8444e7e7ae3e43a9b0f16
Signed-off-by: wuzhouhui <wuzhouhui@kingsoft.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/428321
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Use helper function raid_bdev_config_find_by_name() in destroy_raid_bdev
RPC.
Besides, unify two iterator variables in construct_raid_bdev RPC.
This is too small to add in a separate patch.
Change-Id: If0bbae8993af4e402a82299db378e89245b8966e
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424150
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Initialization of bdev modules don't have fixed ordering.
Hence both cases should succeed to create configured raid bdev
for .INI config file.
1. create raid bdev and then create base bdevs of it.
2. before creating raid bdev, create base bdevs of it.
To do this, factor out adding base bdevs to raid bdev
to a helper function raid_bdev_add_base_devices() first
and then apply it to construct_raid_bdev RPC and parse .INI
config file.
Change-Id: I4389fd4e7bd41296dfa9210bbe8b60348ee5bc9d
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423769
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
When construct_raid_bdev RPC is callled, even if all adding base bdevs
to it fail, a raid bdev with no base bdev should exist and be in
the configuring state.
Extract raid_bdev_create() from raid_bdev_add_base_bdev() and put it
before starting iteration of raid_bdev_add_base_bdev().
This change cam be applied to .INI config file too.
Change-Id: Ia71aca0bbdb33049fe5bd9b8fd8163c99c032401
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424148
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
buf is no longer needed, now that RAID I/O will never
span a strip boundary.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: Icc03b985f540797597c238005bf9883f6f8ad010
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423406
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Now that I/O never span a strip boundary, we don't
need to count splits.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: Iea5df5ca055fe4b338fb5cb0828a45502c239458
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423325
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
When a raid bdev is constructed by JSON-RPC construct_raid_bdev,
information about config and slot can be passed to
raid_bdev_add_base_device() and raid_bdev_can_claim() doesn't have
to be called.
Hence extract raid_bdev_can_claim_bdev() from raid_bdev_add_base_device()
and put it to raid_bdev_examine().
Change-Id: I92e02bf3661cb97b691246f32198ba946810d96c
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423618
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
raid_base_bdev_config is suffciently descriptive as name and so
"name" can be used as the name of the base bdev.
Other structs have used "name" as the name of bdev.
Change-Id: I090ef541a84fd14d9ec3bfebbdc96ae649709551
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423614
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
According to the purpose of the lists, state_link and global_link
will be enough to understand the purpose well.
Besides, in raid_bdev_remove_base_bdev(), if any entry is not removed
during iteration, TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE() is not necessary. Hence
change TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE to TAILQ_FOREACH for this case.
Change-Id: I3022c58faf96721df9241e07dbb5a06d7de89e70
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423056
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Other helper functions raid_bdev_free_base_bdev_resource() and
raid_bdev_cleanup() can be used in check_and_remove_raid_bdev().
Change-Id: I24ce02371f5bb29c3b6111da4475a9ad08e65c21
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/422794
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
struct raid_bdev has a pointer raid_bdev_config to its configuration,
but raid_bdev is duplicated between raid_bdev and raid_bdev_config
and just config may be enough as a name.
Change-Id: I77f6a69b913cd540c22f05803c486a4caf103f24
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/422923
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
In bdev_raid.c and bdev_raid_rpc.c, to hold a pointer to
raid_bdev_config, some have used raid_cfg and other have used
raid_bdev_config.
raid_bdev_config is the name of the struct and using the name of
the struct as a pointer to it may cause any confusion.
Change-Id: Ic87ff04d58ea46c30081aaae8d9cda5a53135be9
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/422922
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
base_bdevs_io_channel is good but base_channel may be enough and
fit other bdev modules.
Change-Id: I67a1d224f1ef4ca1fc048b4325333f2552a37150
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/422921
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
raid_base_bdev_info is sufficiently descriptive as name and so
names of member variables in raid_base_bdev_info can be simplified.
Change-Id: I759a758ec0f3ac21de767ad379a902f1b04cc66d
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/422919
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
During IO submission, raid_bdev can be get by bdev_io->bdev->ctxt.
Hence holding raid_bdev in raid_bdev_io_channel is duplicated.
Change-Id: I722432718aca8c5846541816b6ecca56821d77f6
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/421182
Reviewed-by: Dariusz Stojaczyk <dariuszx.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: GangCao <gang.cao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Locating spdk_bdev structure to the beginning of raid_bdev structure
will simplify the hierarchy and match other bdev modules.
Change-Id: I1bfbf773bc96a4f144e6bff772ade05bb42762e9
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/420818
Reviewed-by: Dariusz Stojaczyk <dariuszx.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Raid module:
============
- SPDK raid bdev module is a new bdev module which is
responsible for striping various NVMe devices and expose the raid bdev
to bdev layer which would enhance the performance and capacity.
- It can support theoretically 256 base devices (currently it is being
tested max upto 8 base devices)
- Multiple strip sizes like 32KB, 64KB, 128KB, 256KB, 512KB etc is
supported. Most of the current testing is focused on 64KB strip size.
- New RPC commands like "create raid bdev", "destroy raid bdev" and "get raid bdevs"
are introduced to configure raid bdev dynamically in a running
SPDK system.
- Currently raid bdev configuration parameters are persisted in the
current SPDK configuration file for across reboot support. DDF will be
introduced later.
High level testing done:
=======================
- Raid bdev is created with 8 base NVMe devices via configuration
file and is exposed to initiator via existing methods. Initiator is
able to see a single NVMe namespace with capacity equal to sum of the
minimum capacities of 8 devices. Initiator was able to run raw
read/write workload, file system workload etc (tested with XFS file
system workload).
- Multiple raid bdevs are also created and exposed to initiator and
tested with file system and other workloads for read/write IO.
- LVS / LVOL are created over raid bdev and exposed to initiator.
Testing was done for raw read/write workloads and XFS file system
workloads.
- RPC testing is done where on the running SPDK system raid bdevs
are created out of NVMe base devices. These raid bdevs (and LVOLs
over raid bdevs) are then exposed to initiator and IO workload was
tested for raw read/write and XFS file system workload.
- RPC testing is done for delete raid bdevs where all raid bdevs
are deleted in running SPDK system.
- RPC testing is done for get raid bdevs where existing list of
raid bdev names is printed (it can be all raid bdevs or only
online or only configuring or only offline).
- RPC testing is done where raid bdevs and underlying NVMe devices
relationship was returned in JSON RPC commands
Change-Id: I10ae1266f8f2cca3c106e4df8c1c0993ddf435d8
Signed-off-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/410484
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
