This is useful for applications even if they elect not to use the SPDK
event framework.
This doesn't shift everything in one go - just the subsystem
initialization logic. Configuration file loading also needs to move
in a separate patch later.
Change-Id: Id419df1045442d416650ed90e5ee78adfdd623d7
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/6641
Community-CI: Broadcom CI
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Since legacy config is being removed, SPDK_ACCEL_MODULE_REGISTER
macro no longer needs field corresponding to processing this
type of configuration.
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
Change-Id: I76ca02487a5fb8f9ecc9d33ac6fa514e7226a03b
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/4636
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@mellanox.com>
Add both the plumbing in the engine to call module entry
points if they exist as well as the json write config
for idxd (the only module with config info at this time).
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: I91376d3fc60227cd79fae17b164722619eafb9e5
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/2052
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
This was added before the usage of having a SW engine and 2 HW
engines was fully thought out. The current rules are:
* if no HW engine specific enable RPC is sent, use SW
* if a HW engine specific enable RPC is sent, use it
* If a 2nd HW engine specific enable RPC is sent, ignore
In this scheme there's no need for an RPC that lets the user
choose which engine to use because they already do so when
they enable an engine.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: I006ffb3b417f1e93bb061b29535d157ba66f03b4
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/2033
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
The copy engine library, modules and public APIs have been renamed.
Use of the word `copy` has been replaced with the word `accel`
short for accelerator in preparation for adding new capabilities
in the future. Additionally, APIs for what was previously called
the `memcpy` engine have been renamed to identify the engine as a
software accelerator.
Signed-off-by: paul luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ia607aa718416146fbba1e6792b8de0f66bd8a5de
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/576
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
