rdma: Fix misordered assert and decrement.
In the error path, we were first decrementing a variable and then asserting that it must be >0. These operations should occur in the opposite order. Change-Id: I6cec544faf17bb75cbfca3d3a3c173dc5db14f99 Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/446440 Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com> Reviewed-by: yidong0635 <dongx.yi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
756ce464f6
commit
59f0d22e40
@ -2784,9 +2784,9 @@ spdk_nvmf_rdma_poller_poll(struct spdk_nvmf_rdma_transport *rtransport,
|
||||
rqpair = SPDK_CONTAINEROF(rdma_req->req.qpair, struct spdk_nvmf_rdma_qpair, qpair);
|
||||
|
||||
SPDK_ERRLOG("data=%p length=%u\n", rdma_req->req.data, rdma_req->req.length);
|
||||
assert(rdma_req->num_outstanding_data_wr > 0);
|
||||
rdma_req->num_outstanding_data_wr--;
|
||||
if (rdma_req->data.wr.opcode == IBV_WR_RDMA_READ) {
|
||||
assert(rdma_req->num_outstanding_data_wr > 0);
|
||||
rqpair->current_read_depth--;
|
||||
if (rdma_req->num_outstanding_data_wr == 0) {
|
||||
rdma_req->state = RDMA_REQUEST_STATE_COMPLETED;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user