iscsi: accumulate data_transferred properly for large writes

Without this fix, large writes would report underflow.  Linux
initiator seems to ignore the underflow condition, but ESXi
initiator would properly detect it.

Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: Icab28531c44f61a8e5529bcee989d0c2bf41d043

Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423906
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Jim Harris 2018-08-29 07:51:35 -07:00 committed by Changpeng Liu
parent b6770c73cc
commit 42daa14f64

View File

@ -900,10 +900,13 @@ spdk_iscsi_task_cpl(struct spdk_scsi_task *scsi_task)
process_read_task_completion(conn, task, primary); process_read_task_completion(conn, task, primary);
} else { } else {
primary->bytes_completed += task->scsi.length; primary->bytes_completed += task->scsi.length;
if ((task != primary) && if (task != primary) {
(task->scsi.status != SPDK_SCSI_STATUS_GOOD)) { if (task->scsi.status == SPDK_SCSI_STATUS_GOOD) {
primary->scsi.data_transferred += task->scsi.data_transferred;
} else {
spdk_scsi_task_copy_status(&primary->scsi, &task->scsi); spdk_scsi_task_copy_status(&primary->scsi, &task->scsi);
} }
}
if (primary->bytes_completed == primary->scsi.transfer_len) { if (primary->bytes_completed == primary->scsi.transfer_len) {
spdk_del_transfer_task(conn, primary->tag); spdk_del_transfer_task(conn, primary->tag);