rpc: ensure RPCs are registered before aliases
Some older clang versions will reorder constructor functions rather than execute them in the order they are defined. This causes registration failures for RPC aliases when the alias is registered before the RPC that it refers to. So use constructor priorities to ensure that all RPCs are registered before any aliases. Fixes issue #892. Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com> Change-Id: I409254ec7172faf3997aa058b433890793499458 Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/463915 Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
59a3afa0ff
commit
0972520167
@ -103,14 +103,20 @@ int spdk_rpc_is_method_allowed(const char *method, uint32_t state_mask);
|
||||
#define SPDK_RPC_STARTUP 0x1
|
||||
#define SPDK_RPC_RUNTIME 0x2
|
||||
|
||||
/* Give SPDK_RPC_REGISTER a higher execution priority than
|
||||
* SPDK_RPC_REGISTER_ALIAS_DEPRECATED to ensure all of the RPCs are registered
|
||||
* before we try registering any aliases. Some older versions of clang may
|
||||
* otherwise execute the constructors in a different order than
|
||||
* defined in the source file (see issue #892).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define SPDK_RPC_REGISTER(method, func, state_mask) \
|
||||
static void __attribute__((constructor)) rpc_register_##func(void) \
|
||||
static void __attribute__((constructor(1000))) rpc_register_##func(void) \
|
||||
{ \
|
||||
spdk_rpc_register_method(method, func, state_mask); \
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#define SPDK_RPC_REGISTER_ALIAS_DEPRECATED(method, alias) \
|
||||
static void __attribute__((constructor)) rpc_register_##alias(void) \
|
||||
static void __attribute__((constructor(1001))) rpc_register_##alias(void) \
|
||||
{ \
|
||||
spdk_rpc_register_alias_deprecated(#method, #alias); \
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user