* Improve the handling of quantized weights
Handling of quantized weights was split between two mechanisms:
- For quantized checkpoints, we used the new weight loader
infrastructure.
- For quantization while loading (EETQ, FP8, bitsandbytes) we
instead relied on conditional in `get_linear`.
Weight loaders support context managers to selectively load
particular layers with different weight loaders, which is useful
for models like Idefics2 AWQ, which uses a quantized text model,
but unquantized vision and connector models. However, the context
manager would be overrided by `get_linear`, which string-checks
`quantizer`. Also, the context manager would not work with
EETQ, FP8, and bitsandbytes.
This change migrates all quantizers to the weight loader infrastructure.
This has several benefits:
- We can use context managers with all quantizers.
- All the implementation details move down to the quantizer layers,
`get_linear` does not need to know how to handle quantizer linear
layers.
- All quantizer weights are strongly typed, we don't pass around
raw tensors.
- We don't have to pass around the `quantizer` string everywhere.
* Exclude non-MLP layers when using FP8 quantization with Llama
Quantized weights were loaded in the `Weights` class, but this was
getting quite unwieldy, where every higher level method to load weights
was a long conditional to cover all the different quantizers.
This change moves loading of quantized weights out of the `Weights`
class. This is done by defining a simple `WeightsLoader` interface
that is implemented by `Exl2WeightsLoader`, `GPTQWeightsLoader`,
and `MarlinWeightsLoader`. These implementations are in the quantizers'
respective modules. The `Weights` class provides the low-level load
operations (such as loading tensors or sharded tensors), but delegates
loads that need quantizer-specific weight processing to a loader. The
loaders still use the low-level functionality provided by `Weights`.
I initially tried making a hierarchy where a class like `GPTQWeights`
would inherit from `Weights`. But it is not very flexible (e.g. does
not work well with the new weight storage mock used in tests) and
the implicit indirections made the code harder to follow.
* Removing IPEX_AVAIL.
Chose to unify CPU and XPU under `ipex`. Most code is exactly similar
except for a very few spots.
The biggest number of spots is the kv-cache layout and the flash_xxx.py
files.
Since those files should be removed soon and factored away, we should
not need them.
* Forgot a few places.
* Unrelated change.
* Fixing HF_TOKEN.
* HF_TOKEN
* add CPU tgi support
Signed-off-by: Wang, Yi A <yi.a.wang@intel.com>
* ipex distributed ops support
Signed-off-by: Wang, Yi A <yi.a.wang@intel.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Wang, Yi A <yi.a.wang@intel.com>
Co-authored-by: Funtowicz Morgan <mfuntowicz@users.noreply.github.com>
Add support for Phi-3-medium
The main difference between the medium and mini models is that medium
uses grouped query attention with a packed QKV matrix. This change adds
support for GQA with packed matrixes to `Weights.get_weights_col_packed`
and uses it for Phi-3. This also allows us to remove the custom
implementation of GQA from dbrx attention loading.
This change adds support for Marlin-quantized models. Marlin is an
FP16xINT4 matmul kernel, which provides good speedups decoding batches
of 16-32 tokens. It supports quantized models with symmetric
quantization, groupsize -1 or 128, and 4-bit.
Tested with:
- Llama 2
- Llama 3
- Phi 3
Mostly straightforward, changes to existing code:
* Wrap quantizer parameters in a small wrapper to avoid passing
around untyped tuples and needing to repack them as a dict.
* Move scratch space computation to warmup, because we need the
maximum input sequence length to avoid allocating huge
scratch buffers that OOM.
# What does this PR do?
<!--
Congratulations! You've made it this far! You're not quite done yet
though.
Once merged, your PR is going to appear in the release notes with the
title you set, so make sure it's a great title that fully reflects the
extent of your awesome contribution.
Then, please replace this with a description of the change and which
issue is fixed (if applicable). Please also include relevant motivation
and context. List any dependencies (if any) that are required for this
change.
Once you're done, someone will review your PR shortly (see the section
"Who can review?" below to tag some potential reviewers). They may
suggest changes to make the code even better. If no one reviewed your PR
after a week has passed, don't hesitate to post a new comment
@-mentioning the same persons---sometimes notifications get lost.
-->
<!-- Remove if not applicable -->
Fixes # (issue)
## Before submitting
- [ ] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the
other checks if that's the case).
- [ ] Did you read the [contributor
guideline](https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#start-contributing-pull-requests),
Pull Request section?
- [ ] Was this discussed/approved via a Github issue or the
[forum](https://discuss.huggingface.co/)? Please add a link
to it if that's the case.
- [ ] Did you make sure to update the documentation with your changes?
Here are the
[documentation
guidelines](https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/tree/main/docs),
and
[here are tips on formatting
docstrings](https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/tree/main/docs#writing-source-documentation).
- [ ] Did you write any new necessary tests?
## Who can review?
Anyone in the community is free to review the PR once the tests have
passed. Feel free to tag
members/contributors who may be interested in your PR.
<!-- Your PR will be replied to more quickly if you can figure out the
right person to tag with @
@OlivierDehaene OR @Narsil
-->
